P
Paolo Marini
Hello everyone,
I am using Outlook 2007 but don't seem to be able to compress the images.
Here are the steps to reproduce the behaviour.
1. Create a new email message.
2. Press the PrintScreen key.
3. Paste the image in the body of the email (either as Bitmap or Device
Independent Bitmap).
4. Select the image.
5. Click on Picture Tools > Format > Compress Pictures.
6. Select the checkbox "Apply to selected pictures only" (doesn't really
make any difference).
7. Click on Options...
8. Select the first two checkboxes (Automatically..., Delete...).
9. Select the last radio button (E-mail 96ppi).
10. Click on OK and then OK.
11. Save the message (without sending it).
12. Open the Drafts folder and check the size of the image: 3MB!).
Although the PrintScreen is capturing both monitors, there is no reason why
the relevant JPEG compressed image should be 3MB.
Also, even if I didn't try to compress the image, the size would have stayed
the same (3MB).
In practice, the compression options don't seem to make any difference
whatsoever.
Is there something like a registry hack that could have disabled this
functionality?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Paolo
I am using Outlook 2007 but don't seem to be able to compress the images.
Here are the steps to reproduce the behaviour.
1. Create a new email message.
2. Press the PrintScreen key.
3. Paste the image in the body of the email (either as Bitmap or Device
Independent Bitmap).
4. Select the image.
5. Click on Picture Tools > Format > Compress Pictures.
6. Select the checkbox "Apply to selected pictures only" (doesn't really
make any difference).
7. Click on Options...
8. Select the first two checkboxes (Automatically..., Delete...).
9. Select the last radio button (E-mail 96ppi).
10. Click on OK and then OK.
11. Save the message (without sending it).
12. Open the Drafts folder and check the size of the image: 3MB!).
Although the PrintScreen is capturing both monitors, there is no reason why
the relevant JPEG compressed image should be 3MB.
Also, even if I didn't try to compress the image, the size would have stayed
the same (3MB).
In practice, the compression options don't seem to make any difference
whatsoever.
Is there something like a registry hack that could have disabled this
functionality?
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Paolo