B
ben.ruset
Hi --
I have two executives that have very, very large mailboxes - 4+GB and
approx 50-70k items. Moving their data to a PST, or archiving it in
any way is out of the question.
They're both on brand new PC's -- one has a laptop and one has a
desktop, both 1.6ghz Core2 Duos with 2GB of RAM. Both are using
Outlook 2003 with all of the latest patches and service packs loaded.
They're both using cached mode, and both have GigE to their machines.
There are times that both users are able to click through their
messages with no problems. There's other times that they will get lags
of 10-30 seconds from going between messages. (Measuring the amount of
time it takes from clicking on a message from the time it takes to
appear in the preview pane.) Sorting messages is slow, but not
unacceptably slow.
Using perfmon on my Exchange server, I see no bottlenecks.
I understand that the size of both of their mailboxes is way outside
the scope of Microsoft's best practices, however wouldn't that yield
consistently bad performance? Both users experience periods that
Outlook works okay, and then periods that it doesn't.
Neither user really has any other apps installed (besides Google
Desktop, which they use for searching their huge mailboxes). We're
using Trend Micro Office Scan for our anti-virus solution, although I
do not believe it does any scanning at the MAPI layer.
My CEO is very upset that his brand new laptop works just as badly -
if not worse - with Outlook than his old one.
If anybody has any suggestions, I'd be very grateful to hear them.
Thanks,
-ben
I have two executives that have very, very large mailboxes - 4+GB and
approx 50-70k items. Moving their data to a PST, or archiving it in
any way is out of the question.
They're both on brand new PC's -- one has a laptop and one has a
desktop, both 1.6ghz Core2 Duos with 2GB of RAM. Both are using
Outlook 2003 with all of the latest patches and service packs loaded.
They're both using cached mode, and both have GigE to their machines.
There are times that both users are able to click through their
messages with no problems. There's other times that they will get lags
of 10-30 seconds from going between messages. (Measuring the amount of
time it takes from clicking on a message from the time it takes to
appear in the preview pane.) Sorting messages is slow, but not
unacceptably slow.
Using perfmon on my Exchange server, I see no bottlenecks.
I understand that the size of both of their mailboxes is way outside
the scope of Microsoft's best practices, however wouldn't that yield
consistently bad performance? Both users experience periods that
Outlook works okay, and then periods that it doesn't.
Neither user really has any other apps installed (besides Google
Desktop, which they use for searching their huge mailboxes). We're
using Trend Micro Office Scan for our anti-virus solution, although I
do not believe it does any scanning at the MAPI layer.
My CEO is very upset that his brand new laptop works just as badly -
if not worse - with Outlook than his old one.
If anybody has any suggestions, I'd be very grateful to hear them.
Thanks,
-ben