Hi DMC -
I'm getting the impression you may be pursuing the wrong ghost
Please
see the in line responses below;
Thanks for trying to help, Dean - but the immediate issue is with Autoshapes
(arrows etc.) which seem to be automatically created as inline, and cannot
therefore be selected, and therefore cannot be converted.
Well, formatting of the shapes themselves is determined by the Options
setting Dean described & each shape is definitely selectable to enable
reformatting *if* they are drawn as independent objects in the document. I
get the feeling, however, that your shapes have actually been drawn in
Drawing Canvasses. If they have, canvasses are always inserted as In Line
regardless of what the Paste/Insert option is set for. That will also
prevent the shapes from having either an in-line or wrapping style applied.
If the Canvas has been resized tightly around the shapes in your Word 2000
documents the Format AutoShape> Layout dialog won't include Text Wrapping
options. However, if you double-click or right-click the hash-mark border
around the selected shape you'll get into the Format Drawing Canvas dialog
where you *will* find the wrapping options.
To avoid the canvas when creating new shapes remove the check which controls
that in Tools> Options - General, or once you select the shape tool pres ESC
to dismiss the canvas before you draw the shape.
And yes, my documents (created in WORD 2000) have a lot of graphics. A great
part of my work is maintaining documents - so I have to be able to control
fine detail in existing material, without having to create it from scratch.
WORD 2003 is messing up my documents, badly.
I'm not sure what you mean by this... My guess here is that there is
something else at play such as fonts and/or printer drivers, or whatever,
because Office 2003 uses the same graphics engine as Office 2000. There's no
likely reason inherent to Word 2003 which should cause it to be "messing up"
your documents. If you can elaborate on exactly what that phrase is intended
to convey perhaps there are some explanations & solutions to be offered.
Right now, it looks easier to demand that my IT department downgrade me back
to WORD 2000.
I can't fault you for thinking that way - Word 2000 is probably one of the
most stable & reliable versions of the program ever released... But so is
2003
There should be no reason for reverting to be necessary.
HTH |:>)
Bob Jones
[MVP] Office:Mac