G
geoff
I have/had a corruption problem with an Access 97 db.
When I ran the compact utility against it, the compact
would 'fail' and entries would be placed in the
mysyscompacterrors table. When I used the compact utility
that is part of Access 2000, the compact does NOT fail,
although entries are put in the msyscompacterrors table.
Subsequent runs of Access 200 compact against the Access
97 db remove the msyscompacterrors (i.e. the 'corruption'
must have been fixed by the previous Access 2000 compact
routine).
So the question is, is it 'okay' to run Access 2000
compact routines against Access 97 mdb's (i.e. is this
supported)?
When I ran the compact utility against it, the compact
would 'fail' and entries would be placed in the
mysyscompacterrors table. When I used the compact utility
that is part of Access 2000, the compact does NOT fail,
although entries are put in the msyscompacterrors table.
Subsequent runs of Access 200 compact against the Access
97 db remove the msyscompacterrors (i.e. the 'corruption'
must have been fixed by the previous Access 2000 compact
routine).
So the question is, is it 'okay' to run Access 2000
compact routines against Access 97 mdb's (i.e. is this
supported)?