for what reason?
jpgs are not a good format for prepress. not good at all. and web work isn't
going to want cmyk.
if a printshop asks for one, they are displaying (unfortunately, for you) a
lack of understanding of the universe of file formats and proper use
thereof.
Herein are some of the problems presented by using jpgs in a prepress
workplace.
1. they are bitmaps. all text wil be rendered in the resolution chosen for
that bitmap. that means it will look chunky and unsharp unless you get up
over 1000-1200 pixels/inch which in a color file presents big (can you say
"farking huge," boys and girls?) files...on the order of over 150 MB per
letter page. The large filesize means the natural tendincy would be to
increase jpg compression
2. jpg compression works like this. suppose you had 4 kids and you decided
to use jpg compression to fit them into two bedrooms each with a private
room. jpg compression means you delete two of the kids. they are gone. jpg
compression is "lossy," that is it throws away data. And it does it every
single stinking time you open it and save it. Ever notice what looked like a
halo around someone's head in a photo? That's usually the result of jpg
compression. And it gets worse each time you save the file.
The alternatives to providing a crappy file like this of a newbie printer
are:
a) provide them with film, made from the publisher file by a service bureau
that is happy to accept your Publisher file and make film from it. Yes,
there are many. I, myself, am one.
b) find a different pritner, one who is happy to accept your Publisher file
and work with it directly. Yes, the are many.
c) learn to create and use PDF files. This will require your obtaining a
copy of Acrobat which will cost a couple hundred bucks or one of the (IMHO
less capable but) less expensive alternatives, such as Jaws (about $120),
etc.
You can find more PDF options at
http://www.mvps.org/publisher
hopes this helps. if not, post back at us<G>