A
Alf P. Steinbach
I'm using Office XP (I guess that means 2003).
Each chapter is in its own Word file.
Each chapter consists of one level 1 heading with sub-headings (level 2,
level 3).
In chapter 2, say, I want that level 1 heading to be numbered "2". When
I change it to "2", in the bullets-&-numbering dialog, it's "2" until I
save, close and re-open the document. Then it's changed back to "1",
and in about half the cases Word has also changed some of the general
options, such as setting fields to always have shading.
I suspect this has something to do with bullet lists being some
secondary kind of paragraph style and having Unholy Unintended
Interactions with paragraph styles, and further that it has to do with
having selected that styles should be automatically updated from the
document template when I open a document.
I want styles to be updated, because I want consistent styles, and I
want per-document settings of numbering etc. to be _retained_.
Do I have to stop usign the built-in numbering and instead simulate the
same using e.g. SEQ-fields? (If so, what utter crap!)
Help.
Each chapter is in its own Word file.
Each chapter consists of one level 1 heading with sub-headings (level 2,
level 3).
In chapter 2, say, I want that level 1 heading to be numbered "2". When
I change it to "2", in the bullets-&-numbering dialog, it's "2" until I
save, close and re-open the document. Then it's changed back to "1",
and in about half the cases Word has also changed some of the general
options, such as setting fields to always have shading.
I suspect this has something to do with bullet lists being some
secondary kind of paragraph style and having Unholy Unintended
Interactions with paragraph styles, and further that it has to do with
having selected that styles should be automatically updated from the
document template when I open a document.
I want styles to be updated, because I want consistent styles, and I
want per-document settings of numbering etc. to be _retained_.
Do I have to stop usign the built-in numbering and instead simulate the
same using e.g. SEQ-fields? (If so, what utter crap!)
Help.