Hi Blair (
[email protected]),
in the newsgroups
you posted:
|| My comparison is between Pub02 and PagePlus9. The biggest advantage
|| in using PP9 for websites is that you can use the master page
|| without any of the problems which crop up if you try doing that in
|| Pub.
True.
|| Pub also allots numbers to images using some unfathomable
|| system, but PP will accept and retain the file names of inserted
|| images. That's a huge advantage if you are trying to keep track of a
|| lot of images and means you don't have to upload the whole site
|| every time you make a change.
Also true.
|| PP's files are smaller and the html code is much more compact and
|| easier to follow if you like to see what is being coded. Pub code
|| is legendary for being long and involved.
While I agree this is the case with Publisher 2002 PRE service packs and the
current Publisher 2003, I saw similar file sizes and coding with Publisher
2000 and older and the patched Publisher 2002.
|| David A is the prophet for PagePlus - perhaps he can give you some
|| more advice on comparisons.
I have been using PagePlus for many years, but not in the web area, so your
information was detailed and good to know. As for the DTP end, I am very
familiar with PagePlus abilities.
--
Brian Kvalheim
Microsoft Publisher MVP
http://www.publishermvps.com
~pay it forward~
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
confers no rights.