Mail merge in Word 2003 is more cumbersome than in previous versio

[Puzzler50]

There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also parts
that now take much more time. Previously, one could easily select a merge
field on the fly, while creating the document. I could quickly add
punctuation, spacing, partial sentences, etc. Now I am out of the document
when I select the merge fields to be incorporated. It takes several extra
keystrokes to insert a variety of fields, especially if the fields are being
inserted into the text of the document.

I have been a heavy user of mail merging for 15 years, and find this to be a
step backward.

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...46a&dg=microsoft.public.word.mailmerge.fields

 

[Graham Mayor]

http://www.gmayor.com/mail_merge_labels_with_word_xp.htm s hould put you
back on track.

--
<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>
Graham Mayor - Word MVP


<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>><<>

 

[Jim Hawkins]

There are many advantages to merging in Word 2003, but there are also
parts
that now take much more time. Previously, one could easily select a merge
field on the fly, while creating the document. I could quickly add
punctuation, spacing, partial sentences, etc. Now I am out of the
document
when I select the merge fields to be incorporated. It takes several extra
keystrokes to insert a variety of fields, especially if the fields are
being
inserted into the text of the document.

I have been a heavy user of mail merging for 15 years, and find this to be
a
step backward.

Agreed. Word2000 got it about right.

Jim Hawkins