Perhaps it should not need to be pointed out yet again, but flat assertions
of the sort that include the words "can" or "can't" -- and their close
cousins, "must" and "must not" -- tend to be dangerous to the credibility of
the person making such assertions because they are so often wrong, and so
easily refuted. Consider the instant case.
One of the inherent problems with developing in Access is that it is INDEED
very possible for two (or more) people to make two (or more) changes to the
same mdb at the same time. And that is a potential problem for which any
competent development team must account in its development protocols.
In fact, one of the SOLUTIONS to this potential problem lies precisely in
creating a development protocol through which only one person has authority
to implement changes to a particular object in a "master"copy of an mdb at
any given time.
But then, wouldn't that be a desirale approach in any other development
environment, as well?
1. Only 1 person can make 1 change at a time with Jet.
If you just lost the training wheels and moved to Access Data
Projects, then you could hire multiple developers.