I'm lucky. I don't need Sync Services.
Yes Diane, you are lucky you don't need it. You're right about Apple.
I've recognized this and opened a case with them and got this over to
engineering. Unfortunately, I don't believe we are going to get
anything out of Apple on this at all. Engineering got back to the
Product Specialist and although they are aware of the issues they will
only support and ensure that mobileme, iCal and Addressbook work
properly and provide all the supporting documentation on their website
to fix sync services should it fail with these products. In terms of
third party products, they have said that unfortunately they have to
leave it to the third party developers to make their products work
properly with what's provided. I told them that all third party
developers are having a heck of a time with this and it is forcing us,
the users, into a proprietary environment that being the Apple
solutions. The product manager immediately said that we should not be
forced to use proprietary solutions but unfortunately his hands were
tired as this was engineerings official stance. He was aware of the
issues, not fully though, out of sync services due to the inital mess
of mobileme and all they had to do to sort that one out.
We won't know whether Outlook resolves this until it comes out of
course but my suspicion is it will work a lot better as they will use
a completely different database architecture suited specifically to
the architectural environment of the Mac. The one thing I worry with
this switch to Outlook is that it is not a pure clone of Outlook on
the PC but rather keeps some of the nice features of Entourage such as
linking and the Project Management facility. Microsoft only cloned
Office once (I think it was v6 in the classic envir) and it didn't go
over well with the Mac community. So possibly they won't do that again.
As you know, the only thing that presents a problem to me and I
suspect many others is the issue of sync. Its all too bad about this
sync serv archit