Word's versioning is notoriously touchy and easily turned off. Somebody
could save-as the document to create a parallel document and make edits to
that which wouldn't be revealed by versioning. The document could be edited
by an earlier version of Word which doesn't support versioning. Chris can
correct me if I'm wrong by I think versioning was intended as a workflow and
collaboration tool -- allowing you to more easily keep multiple versions of
the same document and to be able to revert to a previous version if you
don't like the new changes -- than as a way to defeat people with malicious
intent or to verify the integrity of a document to a rigorous standard. It
would probably be useful to do some reading on digital
signatures and digital rights management for that kind of project.
Technology provides an interesting challenge to the courts. Even video
evidence can be easily tampered with these days. Ultimately the courts have
to determine what is reasonably certain even in the face of possible
tampering. And naturally opposition counsel has to try and introduce
reasonable doubt as to the authenticity of the material.
I'm not aware of a specific case where a Word document has been disallowed
as inherently insecure, but I haven't made any effort to research it either.
If I were looking to secure a document in such a manner that it would stand
up to scrutiny I don't think I'd rely just upon versioning in an otherwise
unprotected format though.
--
Aloha,
-Ben-
Ben M. Schorr, OneNote-MVP
Roland Schorr & Tower
http://www.rolandschorr.com
Microsoft OneNote FAQ:
http://www.factplace.com/onenotefaq.htm
**I apologize but I am unable to respond to direct requests for assistance.
Please post questions and replies here in the newsgroup. Mahalo!