C
chrizio
Halo
My configuration: MS Office 97 polish, sr1 and sr2
I have some problems with a Word document
It consists mainly of the numbered lists. There ar
4-5 such lists in this document. Two of them are very long
(between 150 and 200 list positions)
The document has been created once upon a time using Word 6.0.
And now I'm formatting it in the Word 97 due to false edition metods o
the document's author
The problem: at some list positions the Word starts the list counting wit
1 value. I have tried a plenty of workarounds: linking the position wit
the previous one and creating it once again. Transfering using other document
checking the numbering properties (continuing the last/starting with 1)
None helps. The Word changes the position number to 1 at accident time poin
once again. While viewing the document with HEX-viewer one can see at th
suffered place, that the document text is broken by plenty (about 200) of zero bytes
What can be the cause
Should I better look for workarounds as for issue's reason
Thanks for your hints
chrizio
My configuration: MS Office 97 polish, sr1 and sr2
I have some problems with a Word document
It consists mainly of the numbered lists. There ar
4-5 such lists in this document. Two of them are very long
(between 150 and 200 list positions)
The document has been created once upon a time using Word 6.0.
And now I'm formatting it in the Word 97 due to false edition metods o
the document's author
The problem: at some list positions the Word starts the list counting wit
1 value. I have tried a plenty of workarounds: linking the position wit
the previous one and creating it once again. Transfering using other document
checking the numbering properties (continuing the last/starting with 1)
None helps. The Word changes the position number to 1 at accident time poin
once again. While viewing the document with HEX-viewer one can see at th
suffered place, that the document text is broken by plenty (about 200) of zero bytes
What can be the cause
Should I better look for workarounds as for issue's reason
Thanks for your hints
chrizio