I am sorry if you were offended by my post but what you want to do is
basically undoable. Office 2001 is OS 9.x and prior compatible. Office X
for OS X will work, Office 2001 will always call OS 9 in classic mode to
work.
I also fail to understand your apparent anger at my answer. Ask Quark when
they started to support OS X? Ask Adobe, a major Mac supporter, if all of
their older products work on OS X? I assure you, most of the answers you
get will be no, you must upgrade.
OS X is a major departure from the previous operating system and software
producers were made aware of this and given time to produce compatible
software. Office 2001 will work under OS 9.x and earlier, but to use OS X,
you need to use Office X for the Mac.
This was not MIcrosoft's decision, it was Apple's. If you have any anger to
express, talk to Apple who decided to redesign their OS and not support the
older programs any longer.
--
Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook]
Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact.
After searching google.groups.com and finding no answer:
(e-mail address removed) <
[email protected]>
asked:
| Okaaaaayyyy... Gee, I guess after being in .mac discussions so long I
| took for granted that helpful people came in here and were nice.
|
| Bastet, as for you, charm school isn't that expensive - it consists of
| readding the Bible and believing to "do unto others..." I'm not a
| Microsoft person, I don't know these discussion groups, and I
| certainly didn't mean to offend you in any way by daring to post a
| "non-related, therefore non-important" question on "your" holy grail
| of groups.
| Please accept my humblest of apologies, oh great sage of wisdom, for I
| am but a slug under your feet. I had a question about office, there
| isn't a listing in the office drop menu for those specific instances
| of mac users actually having problems - it doesn't happen all that
| often like with a PC. They're just a higher grade of computer when it
| comes to graphic programs like power point and word. Microsoft knew
| this, or
| they wouldn't have switched over.
|
| And Milly, while I appreciate the fact that you didn't so rudely turn
| me away (I have the feeling bastet would try to hit a homeless person
| with his/her car rahter than have to deal with them being on the
| street wher its holy highness was driving, I mean, who owns the world
| here? - you
| on the other hand would throw something out of your car on your way
| past so as not to get your hands dirty - a little help, but nothing
| that would inconvenience you, and not the whole truth either...). As
| for where "most software developers" are concerned, since switching
| to OS
| X, I've found that only two programs can't be upgraded to OS X
| compatability - one because the program is archaic and it's not made
| anymore. The other is Microsoft Office:mac. I don't believe that
| microsoft would be so cruel as to make mac users (or PC users, either)
| pay twice for the same program just because they upgraded their
| operating system. If you went out and bought a brand-spanking-new
| PC, and it had a higher OS than what you've been using, there would be
| an upgrade for your programs (at least most of them - if they're still
| made) right? Otherwise, how would they convince people to buy new
| computers? If your old software would be unusable, why not just forget
| the new PC? I doubt it. They want people to upgrade to the newest
| technology so one gets the most out of their programs and buys more
| and more.
|
| I think I'll try my luck with tech support, they're paid to be helpful
| whereas you all aren't paid to do anything and show it in your
| greater- than-thou attitudes. I'll stick to my .mac groups. there,
| even if you accidentally get in the wrong forum they don't crawl down
| your back
| and bite your ass, they help you anyway. That's what help forums are
| for, after all. It's not social hour