I think your post got cut off... but "one to many" is not an unusual
concept.
For example, think of a set of libraries. Suppose that you want to have your
database store the contents of 20 libraries. You'd have a table that lists
each library using a unique (primary key) identifier. In each library are
many books. Thus, the relationship of a library to books is One-to-Many, as
your database would need to store the list of books in a table and include
for each book the library (or libraries) in which the book is located. Thus,
one library has many books.
And one book may have many authors.
And one author may have many names.
Or one author may have many books.
Etc.