I feel relatively safe predicting that while OneNote and Outlook are
exceedingly unlikely to merge into one product, the opportunity for rich
integration between them is quite clear - we'll think about it a great deal
as we design the next versions of both.
At the risk of going completely off into the philisophical weeds - there is
one significant difference between OneNote and Outlook that I believe will
keep them distinct. Outlook is at its core a tool for recording and
managing all of the chunks of information in your life that obey one of a
smallish set of incredibly important schema - Message, Appointment, Contact,
etc. OneNote, on the other hand, is all about letting you record
information in a freeform, general way without any constraints of schema.
You can happily type a paragraph that starts out being a record of an
appointment and then turns into a contact without us getting in the way. We
may attempt to add features that "recognize" various schemas and try to
behave appropriately (say we notice paragraph that look more or less like
contacts and offer to create real Outlook contacts from the data) but we'll
never forget that the data as you entered it is the fundamental truth and
any guesses we've made as to how to make sense of it are just guesses.
I think both flavors of information (and the interactions between them) are
incredibly valuable.
Does that make any sense?
- Peter Engrav (MS, OneNote Dev Manager)
Dana DeLouis said:
My opinion would be that it would be difficult to integrate them. The file
size of Outlook is just to big (1 big *.pst file!) to incorporate the
additional large file/files from Onenote. I have always wished that Outlook
would incorporate a file structure similar to Onenote to break the file size
down.