...winston said:
The post originated stand-alone from Windows Mail
and was posted to the the Outlook and WLM newsgroup.
In fact, we can't tell that for sure. I inferred that the OP
reads mainly in the Outlook NG and added WLMail as
an afterthought.
One doesn't post from Outlook, think of the 'News' button in OL
as a item that opens a different application(similar to a url for
IE, a link in an html document, etc). The 'News' button
can be added to the Outlook Menu bar(File-Edit etc..it is
normally place on the Go drop-down menu) or it can be added
to the ToolBar(akin to adding an available command by customizing
the Word or Excel toolbar)
In which case there is a implementation associated with the
menu and since the OP mentioned something was done to
activate the News menu item, it implies that there is some
kind of customization available. Often such customization
is implemented via registry values or (lately) an XML file.
The OL 'news' button works for me in OL2007 on Vista SP1,
but WLM has a few quirks(see earlier response) when WLM
is not already open. If WLM is opened, the OL News button
switches focus to the current open WLM window(without any
of those quirks mentioned).
I thought the OP said it switched to WM (not WLMail)?
In that case it would be a matter of changing the customization
(whatever the implementation is) to specify wlmail.exe
instead of wmail.exe
Does ProcMon provide information on customizing a toolbar in Excel, Word, etc..?
Provided the implementation is parameterized and not
hardcoded, yes. ProcMon integrates the tracing that
RegMon and FileMon provide. So, if the implementation
of the menu's parameterization is via the registry you
would be able to see the values read that way
or if the it's via a file you would have a clue about which
files are used by seeing one read. Note that these
things might not occur dynamically; so if your tracing
didn't expose them just any time you chose to use the
menu you might have to trace the initial opening of the
application and then try to guess how such values might
be used internally subsequently.
If you're right about Outlook being able to find WLMail
windows sometime, then that is information I did not have
when I replied and which would have substantially changed
my reply, if I had bothered replying then at all.
HTH
Robert
---