OUTLINE NUMBERED TOC

[Cmpn.sb]

WORD 2003: I have an OUTLINE NUMBERED LIST in my TOC which matches my
document outline. When I entered TOC STYLES 1-4 in the LINK-LEVEL-TO-STYLE
box the TOC returned the desired relult. But here's my problem: When I create
a BOOKMARK TOC heading up each section, the TOC includes two NUMBERED LISTS,
like this: XIII. > I. (TOC HEADING). I should perhaps also mention that the
document has multiple (In-Genral \ In Depth) TOC's. DID I WIN?
CSB

 

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

You should not need to add numbering to your TOC styles, as the TOC entries
will pick up the numbering from your headings.

 

[Cmpn.sb]

Thank you for the quick response! The TOC entries picked up the numbering
from my headings without having to add numbering to my TOC STYLES - I used
these styles in order to have the numbering picked up in a TC FIELD -- where
the numbering was not picked up without these modifications. Is there a
switch to include numbering in a TC FIELD?
CSB

 

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

A TC field is used to create literal text for TOC to pick up. It doesn't
include numbering unless you include numbering in the field. Why are you
using TC fields?

 

[Cmpn.sb]

"PRACTICE IN WORD" - from "MICROSOFT OFFICE WORD HELP" / TRAINING / MULTIPLE
TOC's / - My document requires: GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS (TOC field) ;
IN-DEPTH TABLE OF CONTENTS - PART I and PART II - with sub-headings (TC
fields "C" and "D" for PARTS I and II respectively - to update on separate
pages); and BOOK-MARK TOC's throughout each section. The actual content is
about 350 pages.

 

[Suzanne S. Barnhill]

I'm not sure whether you mean that a school assignment requires that you use
TC fields for practice or that you have a practical reason for using them,
but it should not be necessary to use TC fields just to get subheadings.