I wouldn't say it simplifies things but is should make it easier to figure
out.
I'm assuming you mean myname has duplicates of all messages sent to myname,
not that myname is getting copies of info's messages. If my assumption is
wrong, info is forwarding copies to myname.
Do you have web access so you can verify the messages aren't duplicated on
the server?
--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Need Help with Common Tasks?
http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
Outlook Tips by email:
(e-mail address removed)
EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
(e-mail address removed)
You can access this newsgroup by visiting
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx or point your
newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com.
Actually I've just checked and those 3 are to different email addresses.
I
have 2 work ones that differ only by the prefix - myname@address and
info@address - the one with my name is getting the duplicates but the info
one isn't. Neither is my personal email address. Does this simplify
things
or not??
:
Yes the copies remain in the inbox. I've checked and I don't have any
rules
set up to do anything. When I say 'most', I've had 3 out of 31 in the
last
24 hours that weren't affected - all the others have had duplicates.
Nothing
seems to connect those 3 - most of my emails are spam.
:
Since only 'most' are affected, do both copies remain in the inbox or
do you
have rules moving the messages?
--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Need Help with Common Tasks?
http://www.outlook-tips.net/beginner/
Outlook 2007:
http://www.slipstick.com/outlook/ol2007/
Outlook Tips by email:
(e-mail address removed)
EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
(e-mail address removed)
You can access this newsgroup by visiting
http://www.microsoft.com/office/community/en-us/default.mspx or point
your
newsreader to msnews.microsoft.com.
I'm receiving 2 copies of most of my emails using Outlook 2003. The
duplicate copy is being retrieved at the same time as the original,
so
it's
not as though the original is left on the server to be downloaded
again at
the next send/receive request.
Any help would be much appreciated.