G
Guest
The junk mail filtering rules in Outlook are a failure. There is a ton of
rules that do absolutely nothing useful when I could have used something like
simple regular expression parsing on the sender's address to create a bullet
proof spam filter.
Example, I keep getting spam mail with this format:
Yada Yada [[email protected]]
Now, all I need to do is search the sender's address string for something
like " [" or even ".com]" and not one of those junk mails would ever reach
me, and Outlook's highest spam filter setting miraculously fails to catch
these simple spam messages.
I tried the "com]" rule where it looks for WORDS in the SENDER'S address...
and the rule fails, it does absolutely nothing. I guess because the Outlook
parser expects it to be a stand alone word delimited by white space???
Anyway, I could write a regular expression parser in 10 minutes that would
spank all over the current rules in Outlook...
Sorry, but I'm just irritated that I cannot creat such a simple filter in
Outlook.
As you can tell, I'm getting spammed and cannot block it, so I think regular
expressions in a future update would be great.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...d88c205cb&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general
rules that do absolutely nothing useful when I could have used something like
simple regular expression parsing on the sender's address to create a bullet
proof spam filter.
Example, I keep getting spam mail with this format:
Yada Yada [[email protected]]
Now, all I need to do is search the sender's address string for something
like " [" or even ".com]" and not one of those junk mails would ever reach
me, and Outlook's highest spam filter setting miraculously fails to catch
these simple spam messages.
I tried the "com]" rule where it looks for WORDS in the SENDER'S address...
and the rule fails, it does absolutely nothing. I guess because the Outlook
parser expects it to be a stand alone word delimited by white space???
Anyway, I could write a regular expression parser in 10 minutes that would
spank all over the current rules in Outlook...
Sorry, but I'm just irritated that I cannot creat such a simple filter in
Outlook.
As you can tell, I'm getting spammed and cannot block it, so I think regular
expressions in a future update would be great.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...d88c205cb&dg=microsoft.public.outlook.general