page numbers not printing properly

L

Lynne Watson

We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson
 
D

Dayo Mitchell

Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)
 
M

Matt Centurión [MSFT]

Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File |
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to, rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]
 
J

John McGhie

Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File |
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to, rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <[email protected]>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.

John said:
Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:


We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson
Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File |
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to, rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]

Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
J

John McGhie

Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


John said:
Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo Mitchell"


Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:


We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File |
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to, rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]

Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <[email protected]>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.

John said:
Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


John said:
Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],



On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo Mitchell"



Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:



We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File |
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to, rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]
Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.

I use Mozilla which is standards compliant. Another MS only deal guess
it was written in FrontPage. (which with about 90 percent of web
designers is a swear word. :)

Guess I'll have to open it with IE to print it. :-(

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.

John said:
Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


John said:
Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],



On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo Mitchell"



Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:



We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File |
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to, rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]
Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.
yep uck!! I used IE and it printed like a charm.

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
J

John McGhie

Phillip:

If you spend enough time with the open source browsers, you will find that
while they may be "standards compliant" they're all a little selective about
which standards they actually comply with, and to what extent.

Much like the name brand browsers, actually :)

Yes, of course that particular article was created in FrontPage. The entire
website was created in FrontPage, with the exception of the Mac section,
which Beth did using DreamWeaver. Many of the longer articles were actually
created using Microsoft Word instead of any HTML editor.

And yes, Web designers do consider FrontPage to be a swear word, and there's
a reason for that. It's very difficult to charge $10,000 for a site that
takes a professional web coder two weeks to make in DreamWeaver when some
klutz with a copy of FrontPage can achieve exactly the same appearance in 15
minutes by dragging and dropping stuff around in FrontPage.

Yesterday I created a 250-page subweb in 15 minutes. I used Word. The
much-revered web editors won't get anywhere near that level of productivity.

So I am more than happy for the web designer community to hang onto its
religious convictions. Because *I* get to hang onto the customer's money
:)

Cheers


John said:
Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


John McGhie wrote:

Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],



On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo
Mitchell"



Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are
some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting
the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:



We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File
|
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to,
rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]



Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.

I use Mozilla which is standards compliant. Another MS only deal guess
it was written in FrontPage. (which with about 90 percent of web
designers is a swear word. :)

Guess I'll have to open it with IE to print it. :-(

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <[email protected]>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.

I use DreamWeaver as well for maintaining My Association's website.

I can use word documents as well just hsave them as html

Then open them in DreamWeaver and use command "Fix Microsoft HTML".

If I need to make minor corrections they are easy to do.

By the way you can drag and drop Images as well into Macromedia
DreamWeaver. Have Beth sit down with you and show you how.

Deamweaver is set up so you can use code window in which if your a Code
PhD you can use that window, you can WYSIWYG window (use all that Drag
and Drop stuff), or a Split view (Showing both).

By the way MS is one of the founding Corps that created W3C the very
standards it gives the one finger salute to.

While front page may be drag and drop easy. what makes it a swear word
is not easy of use. But the code is so bad that it causes problems in
"all" Browsers in Mac/Windows/Linux/UNIX except IE. which has self
healing feature that anticipates missing code or duplicate code
Elements, and either suplies the missing pieces, or ingnores the
duplicate items.

John said:
Phillip:

If you spend enough time with the open source browsers, you will find that
while they may be "standards compliant" they're all a little selective about
which standards they actually comply with, and to what extent.

Much like the name brand browsers, actually :)

Yes, of course that particular article was created in FrontPage. The entire
website was created in FrontPage, with the exception of the Mac section,
which Beth did using DreamWeaver. Many of the longer articles were actually
created using Microsoft Word instead of any HTML editor.

And yes, Web designers do consider FrontPage to be a swear word, and there's
a reason for that. It's very difficult to charge $10,000 for a site that
takes a professional web coder two weeks to make in DreamWeaver when some
klutz with a copy of FrontPage can achieve exactly the same appearance in 15
minutes by dragging and dropping stuff around in FrontPage.

Yesterday I created a 250-page subweb in 15 minutes. I used Word. The
much-revered web editors won't get anywhere near that level of productivity.

So I am more than happy for the web designer community to hang onto its
religious convictions. Because *I* get to hang onto the customer's money
:)

Cheers


John said:
Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


On 5/10/04 1:24 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),



John McGhie wrote:


Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],




On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo
Mitchell"




Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are
some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting
the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:




We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to "File
|
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to,
rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]



Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.
I use Mozilla which is standards compliant. Another MS only deal guess
it was written in FrontPage. (which with about 90 percent of web
designers is a swear word. :)

Guess I'll have to open it with IE to print it. :-(


--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
J

John McGhie

Hi Phillip:

Around here, it's worth mentioning that the DreamWeaver "Fix Microsoft HTML"
command is a bit of a double-edged sword.

It may "Fix" your code, or it may do something else entirely that also
begins with "F"...

Because Microsoft Word does not "produce" HTML. It never has. It produces
XML.

Experienced users who know that what they really wanted was HTML can use
DreamWeaver's "Fix" command to very good effect (FrontPage 2003 has a
similar function that works just as nicely).

However, inexperienced users need to be warned that if they use this
command, they won't get their document back! This can cause them to use
rude words...

Microsoft's design goal with XML was to enable a Word document to be
perfectly expressed in XML, so you could literally "round-trip" it to a "Web
Page" and back again without losing anything. And you can.

However, if you strip the XML out (which is what the DreamWeaver command
does) the resulting file is HTML not XML. It does not contain enough
information for an application to re-assemble a Word document from the code.

For a web person, that wouldn't matter at all, and they can use the
reduction in code that results. But for office workers publishing things to
the corporate intranet, they are going to come messily unstuck when they
discover that their Excel spreadsheet lost all its formulas, their Word
document pictures and charts are no longer updateable, or their PowerPoint
presentations no longer "present".

XML is now a relatively common language on the "Web". All of the major
browsers support it. There is no law that says the "Web" must use only
HTML. XML is also a W3C standard. And you can do a hell of a lot more with
it than you can with HTML.

Interestingly, one of the character-building features of XML is that it is
designed to be decoded by a lighter-weight parser that HTML, so one thing
that is illegal in XML is implying the closing tag. You have to specify
both tags in each pair in XML :)

But what I am really trying to say, for users less experienced than Phillip,
is "don't strip Word's web code unless you know what you are doing: you may
end up breaking your document."

Cheers


I use DreamWeaver as well for maintaining My Association's website.

I can use word documents as well just hsave them as html

Then open them in DreamWeaver and use command "Fix Microsoft HTML".

If I need to make minor corrections they are easy to do.

By the way you can drag and drop Images as well into Macromedia
DreamWeaver. Have Beth sit down with you and show you how.

Deamweaver is set up so you can use code window in which if your a Code
PhD you can use that window, you can WYSIWYG window (use all that Drag
and Drop stuff), or a Split view (Showing both).

By the way MS is one of the founding Corps that created W3C the very
standards it gives the one finger salute to.

While front page may be drag and drop easy. what makes it a swear word
is not easy of use. But the code is so bad that it causes problems in
"all" Browsers in Mac/Windows/Linux/UNIX except IE. which has self
healing feature that anticipates missing code or duplicate code
Elements, and either suplies the missing pieces, or ingnores the
duplicate items.

John said:
Phillip:

If you spend enough time with the open source browsers, you will find that
while they may be "standards compliant" they're all a little selective about
which standards they actually comply with, and to what extent.

Much like the name brand browsers, actually :)

Yes, of course that particular article was created in FrontPage. The entire
website was created in FrontPage, with the exception of the Mac section,
which Beth did using DreamWeaver. Many of the longer articles were actually
created using Microsoft Word instead of any HTML editor.

And yes, Web designers do consider FrontPage to be a swear word, and there's
a reason for that. It's very difficult to charge $10,000 for a site that
takes a professional web coder two weeks to make in DreamWeaver when some
klutz with a copy of FrontPage can achieve exactly the same appearance in 15
minutes by dragging and dropping stuff around in FrontPage.

Yesterday I created a 250-page subweb in 15 minutes. I used Word. The
much-revered web editors won't get anywhere near that level of productivity.

So I am more than happy for the web designer community to hang onto its
religious convictions. Because *I* get to hang onto the customer's money
:)

Cheers


John McGhie wrote:

Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


On 5/10/04 1:24 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),



John McGhie wrote:


Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],




On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo
Mitchell"




Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are
some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting
the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:




We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to
"File
|
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to,
rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items
outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]



Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.


I use Mozilla which is standards compliant. Another MS only deal guess
it was written in FrontPage. (which with about 90 percent of web
designers is a swear word. :)

Guess I'll have to open it with IE to print it. :-(

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <[email protected]>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.

I won't dispute what you say.

I ill add though Dreamwaever does XML or XHTML as well. In fact
Dreamweaver, can create many different types of code.

John said:
Hi Phillip:

Around here, it's worth mentioning that the DreamWeaver "Fix Microsoft HTML"
command is a bit of a double-edged sword.

It may "Fix" your code, or it may do something else entirely that also
begins with "F"...

Because Microsoft Word does not "produce" HTML. It never has. It produces
XML.

Experienced users who know that what they really wanted was HTML can use
DreamWeaver's "Fix" command to very good effect (FrontPage 2003 has a
similar function that works just as nicely).

However, inexperienced users need to be warned that if they use this
command, they won't get their document back! This can cause them to use
rude words...

Microsoft's design goal with XML was to enable a Word document to be
perfectly expressed in XML, so you could literally "round-trip" it to a "Web
Page" and back again without losing anything. And you can.

However, if you strip the XML out (which is what the DreamWeaver command
does) the resulting file is HTML not XML. It does not contain enough
information for an application to re-assemble a Word document from the code.

For a web person, that wouldn't matter at all, and they can use the
reduction in code that results. But for office workers publishing things to
the corporate intranet, they are going to come messily unstuck when they
discover that their Excel spreadsheet lost all its formulas, their Word
document pictures and charts are no longer updateable, or their PowerPoint
presentations no longer "present".

XML is now a relatively common language on the "Web". All of the major
browsers support it. There is no law that says the "Web" must use only
HTML. XML is also a W3C standard. And you can do a hell of a lot more with
it than you can with HTML.

Interestingly, one of the character-building features of XML is that it is
designed to be decoded by a lighter-weight parser that HTML, so one thing
that is illegal in XML is implying the closing tag. You have to specify
both tags in each pair in XML :)

But what I am really trying to say, for users less experienced than Phillip,
is "don't strip Word's web code unless you know what you are doing: you may
end up breaking your document."

Cheers


I use DreamWeaver as well for maintaining My Association's website.

I can use word documents as well just save them as html

Then open them in DreamWeaver and use command "Fix Microsoft HTML".

If I need to make minor corrections they are easy to do.

By the way you can drag and drop Images as well into Macromedia
DreamWeaver. Have Beth sit down with you and show you how.

Deamweaver is set up so you can use code window in which if your a Code
PhD you can use that window, you can WYSIWYG window (use all that Drag
and Drop stuff), or a Split view (Showing both).

By the way MS is one of the founding Corps that created W3C the very
standards it gives the one finger salute to.

While front page may be drag and drop easy. what makes it a swear word
is not easy of use. But the code is so bad that it causes problems in
"all" Browsers in Mac/Windows/Linux/UNIX except IE. which has self
healing feature that anticipates missing code or duplicate code
Elements, and either suplies the missing pieces, or ingnores the
duplicate items.

John said:
Phillip:

If you spend enough time with the open source browsers, you will find that
while they may be "standards compliant" they're all a little selective about
which standards they actually comply with, and to what extent.

Much like the name brand browsers, actually :)

Yes, of course that particular article was created in FrontPage. The entire
website was created in FrontPage, with the exception of the Mac section,
which Beth did using DreamWeaver. Many of the longer articles were actually
created using Microsoft Word instead of any HTML editor.

And yes, Web designers do consider FrontPage to be a swear word, and there's
a reason for that. It's very difficult to charge $10,000 for a site that
takes a professional web coder two weeks to make in DreamWeaver when some
klutz with a copy of FrontPage can achieve exactly the same appearance in 15
minutes by dragging and dropping stuff around in FrontPage.

Yesterday I created a 250-page subweb in 15 minutes. I used Word. The
much-revered web editors won't get anywhere near that level of productivity.

So I am more than happy for the web designer community to hang onto its
religious convictions. Because *I* get to hang onto the customer's money
:)

Cheers


On 6/10/04 4:51 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),



John McGhie wrote:


Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


On 5/10/04 1:24 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),




John McGhie wrote:



Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],





On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo
Mitchell"





Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there are
some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs. inserting
the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:





We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to
"File
|
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to,
rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items
outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]



Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.


I use Mozilla which is standards compliant. Another MS only deal guess
it was written in FrontPage. (which with about 90 percent of web
designers is a swear word. :)

Guess I'll have to open it with IE to print it. :-(


--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
J

John McGhie

Hi Phillip:

Sure, Yeah, I know. XML is the coming thing, most modern applications now
support it. HTML will not go away, but more and more applications will move
to XML because it allows you to encode more things into the document.

My point is simply that if you "fix" Word's XML to make it into HTML, you
are removing information from the file. And if you do, you can't get a Word
document back from the result because you have removed things such as
headers and footers, numbering schemes, macros, floating objects, complex
layering and wrap-around graphics.

The "fixed" file does not contain enough information to re-create the
original Word document. The XML produced by Word does. Users need to be
aware of that fact.

Cheers


I won't dispute what you say.

I ill add though Dreamwaever does XML or XHTML as well. In fact
Dreamweaver, can create many different types of code.

John said:
Hi Phillip:

Around here, it's worth mentioning that the DreamWeaver "Fix Microsoft HTML"
command is a bit of a double-edged sword.

It may "Fix" your code, or it may do something else entirely that also
begins with "F"...

Because Microsoft Word does not "produce" HTML. It never has. It produces
XML.

Experienced users who know that what they really wanted was HTML can use
DreamWeaver's "Fix" command to very good effect (FrontPage 2003 has a
similar function that works just as nicely).

However, inexperienced users need to be warned that if they use this
command, they won't get their document back! This can cause them to use
rude words...

Microsoft's design goal with XML was to enable a Word document to be
perfectly expressed in XML, so you could literally "round-trip" it to a "Web
Page" and back again without losing anything. And you can.

However, if you strip the XML out (which is what the DreamWeaver command
does) the resulting file is HTML not XML. It does not contain enough
information for an application to re-assemble a Word document from the code.

For a web person, that wouldn't matter at all, and they can use the
reduction in code that results. But for office workers publishing things to
the corporate intranet, they are going to come messily unstuck when they
discover that their Excel spreadsheet lost all its formulas, their Word
document pictures and charts are no longer updateable, or their PowerPoint
presentations no longer "present".

XML is now a relatively common language on the "Web". All of the major
browsers support it. There is no law that says the "Web" must use only
HTML. XML is also a W3C standard. And you can do a hell of a lot more with
it than you can with HTML.

Interestingly, one of the character-building features of XML is that it is
designed to be decoded by a lighter-weight parser that HTML, so one thing
that is illegal in XML is implying the closing tag. You have to specify
both tags in each pair in XML :)

But what I am really trying to say, for users less experienced than Phillip,
is "don't strip Word's web code unless you know what you are doing: you may
end up breaking your document."

Cheers


I use DreamWeaver as well for maintaining My Association's website.

I can use word documents as well just save them as html

Then open them in DreamWeaver and use command "Fix Microsoft HTML".

If I need to make minor corrections they are easy to do.

By the way you can drag and drop Images as well into Macromedia
DreamWeaver. Have Beth sit down with you and show you how.

Deamweaver is set up so you can use code window in which if your a Code
PhD you can use that window, you can WYSIWYG window (use all that Drag
and Drop stuff), or a Split view (Showing both).

By the way MS is one of the founding Corps that created W3C the very
standards it gives the one finger salute to.

While front page may be drag and drop easy. what makes it a swear word
is not easy of use. But the code is so bad that it causes problems in
"all" Browsers in Mac/Windows/Linux/UNIX except IE. which has self
healing feature that anticipates missing code or duplicate code
Elements, and either suplies the missing pieces, or ingnores the
duplicate items.

John McGhie wrote:

Phillip:

If you spend enough time with the open source browsers, you will find that
while they may be "standards compliant" they're all a little selective
about
which standards they actually comply with, and to what extent.

Much like the name brand browsers, actually :)

Yes, of course that particular article was created in FrontPage. The
entire
website was created in FrontPage, with the exception of the Mac section,
which Beth did using DreamWeaver. Many of the longer articles were
actually
created using Microsoft Word instead of any HTML editor.

And yes, Web designers do consider FrontPage to be a swear word, and
there's
a reason for that. It's very difficult to charge $10,000 for a site that
takes a professional web coder two weeks to make in DreamWeaver when some
klutz with a copy of FrontPage can achieve exactly the same appearance in
15
minutes by dragging and dropping stuff around in FrontPage.

Yesterday I created a 250-page subweb in 15 minutes. I used Word. The
much-revered web editors won't get anywhere near that level of
productivity.

So I am more than happy for the web designer community to hang onto its
religious convictions. Because *I* get to hang onto the customer's money
:)

Cheers


On 6/10/04 4:51 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),



John McGhie wrote:


Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you
hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


On 5/10/04 1:24 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),




John McGhie wrote:



Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article
BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],





On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo
Mitchell"





Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there
are
some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs.
inserting
the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave
differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:





We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to
"File
|
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to,
rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items
outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]



Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.


I use Mozilla which is standards compliant. Another MS only deal guess
it was written in FrontPage. (which with about 90 percent of web
designers is a swear word. :)

Guess I'll have to open it with IE to print it. :-(

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <[email protected]>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.

What I do is keep the original as a .doc file then I create a HTML (save
as html) file, then I open this file in DreamWeaver If I want a html
copy of the original document as formatted by Word I can always save
again as html with a slightly different name.

Except for IE (which naturally knows what all the html code is for) all
other "major" web browsers show strange code.

In Mozilla, FireFox, Netscape 7x, Opera, iCab a word document looks
terrible because you see all these strange codes unhidden within the
document.

and as for Standards. all the above mentioned Browsers are trying to
keep to W3C standards. MS is one of the first members of W3C but choose
to avoid using W3C standards. This is a ploy to make people the go to
sites that use their standards to "have" to use IE to view.

If everyone would follow W3C then even IE would be able to view more
Websites than they do now. And People would like IE more.

But; people designing websites would have to put more effort into
creation and error checking. They would reach a larger audience in the
long run.

John said:
Hi Phillip:

Sure, Yeah, I know. XML is the coming thing, most modern applications now
support it. HTML will not go away, but more and more applications will move
to XML because it allows you to encode more things into the document.

My point is simply that if you "fix" Word's XML to make it into HTML, you
are removing information from the file. And if you do, you can't get a Word
document back from the result because you have removed things such as
headers and footers, numbering schemes, macros, floating objects, complex
layering and wrap-around graphics.

The "fixed" file does not contain enough information to re-create the
original Word document. The XML produced by Word does. Users need to be
aware of that fact.

Cheers


I won't dispute what you say.

I ill add though Dreamwaever does XML or XHTML as well. In fact
Dreamweaver, can create many different types of code.

John said:
Hi Phillip:

Around here, it's worth mentioning that the DreamWeaver "Fix Microsoft HTML"
command is a bit of a double-edged sword.

It may "Fix" your code, or it may do something else entirely that also
begins with "F"...

Because Microsoft Word does not "produce" HTML. It never has. It produces
XML.

Experienced users who know that what they really wanted was HTML can use
DreamWeaver's "Fix" command to very good effect (FrontPage 2003 has a
similar function that works just as nicely).

However, inexperienced users need to be warned that if they use this
command, they won't get their document back! This can cause them to use
rude words...

Microsoft's design goal with XML was to enable a Word document to be
perfectly expressed in XML, so you could literally "round-trip" it to a "Web
Page" and back again without losing anything. And you can.

However, if you strip the XML out (which is what the DreamWeaver command
does) the resulting file is HTML not XML. It does not contain enough
information for an application to re-assemble a Word document from the code.

For a web person, that wouldn't matter at all, and they can use the
reduction in code that results. But for office workers publishing things to
the corporate intranet, they are going to come messily unstuck when they
discover that their Excel spreadsheet lost all its formulas, their Word
document pictures and charts are no longer updateable, or their PowerPoint
presentations no longer "present".

XML is now a relatively common language on the "Web". All of the major
browsers support it. There is no law that says the "Web" must use only
HTML. XML is also a W3C standard. And you can do a hell of a lot more with
it than you can with HTML.

Interestingly, one of the character-building features of XML is that it is
designed to be decoded by a lighter-weight parser that HTML, so one thing
that is illegal in XML is implying the closing tag. You have to specify
both tags in each pair in XML :)

But what I am really trying to say, for users less experienced than Phillip,
is "don't strip Word's web code unless you know what you are doing: you may
end up breaking your document."

Cheers


On 10/10/04 2:09 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),



I use DreamWeaver as well for maintaining My Association's website.

I can use word documents as well just save them as html

Then open them in DreamWeaver and use command "Fix Microsoft HTML".

If I need to make minor corrections they are easy to do.

By the way you can drag and drop Images as well into Macromedia
DreamWeaver. Have Beth sit down with you and show you how.

Deamweaver is set up so you can use code window in which if your a Code
PhD you can use that window, you can WYSIWYG window (use all that Drag
and Drop stuff), or a Split view (Showing both).

By the way MS is one of the founding Corps that created W3C the very
standards it gives the one finger salute to.

While front page may be drag and drop easy. what makes it a swear word
is not easy of use. But the code is so bad that it causes problems in
"all" Browsers in Mac/Windows/Linux/UNIX except IE. which has self
healing feature that anticipates missing code or duplicate code
Elements, and either suplies the missing pieces, or ingnores the
duplicate items.

John McGhie wrote:


Phillip:

If you spend enough time with the open source browsers, you will find that
while they may be "standards compliant" they're all a little selective
about
which standards they actually comply with, and to what extent.

Much like the name brand browsers, actually :)

Yes, of course that particular article was created in FrontPage. The
entire
website was created in FrontPage, with the exception of the Mac section,
which Beth did using DreamWeaver. Many of the longer articles were
actually
created using Microsoft Word instead of any HTML editor.

And yes, Web designers do consider FrontPage to be a swear word, and
there's
a reason for that. It's very difficult to charge $10,000 for a site that
takes a professional web coder two weeks to make in DreamWeaver when some
klutz with a copy of FrontPage can achieve exactly the same appearance in
15
minutes by dragging and dropping stuff around in FrontPage.

Yesterday I created a 250-page subweb in 15 minutes. I used Word. The
much-revered web editors won't get anywhere near that level of
productivity.

So I am more than happy for the web designer community to hang onto its
religious convictions. Because *I* get to hang onto the customer's money
:)

Cheers


On 6/10/04 4:51 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),




John McGhie wrote:



Phillip: That's weird. It printed perfectly here from Safari (once you
hit
RELOAD enough times to get the page to display...)

Which browser were you using?

Cheers


On 5/10/04 1:24 AM, in article (e-mail address removed),





John McGhie wrote:




Thanks Matt:

Fixed it (the article, not the user's problem...) :)

Cheers

John.


On 30/9/04 8:42 AM, in article
BD808853.14AA8%[email protected],






On 9/27/04 12:28 PM, in article
BD7DB7DD.40CF7%[email protected], "Dayo
Mitchell"






Are you on a Mac? HP is known to have issues with that, and there
are
some
beta drivers that might fix it, but I didn't realize it extended to
MacWord.

See if this helps:
http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Formatting/BottomsDontPrint.htm
(hit refresh a few times in Safari, or use a different browser)

Does it make a difference if you use Insert | Page Number vs.
inserting
the
page number from the header/footer toolbar? (these behave
differently)

On 9/27/04 8:26 AM, "Lynne Watson" wrote:






We are unable to make page numbers print correctly at the
bottom of a page.

When I insert a page number it prints only the top half of
the digit. Changing the margin settings seems to have no
effect. The only work around is to enter the footer and put
a carriage return below the number.

I am using two HP printers a G55 and a psc 1310 with the
same result.

Any help much appreciated.

Lynne Watson


Another solution (which should be added to the MVP page) is to go to
"File
|
Page Setup" and actually choose the printer you will be printing to,
rather
than "Any Printer" and OK. Then Word will either warn you of items
outside
printable region or will just print fine.

Matt
MacWord Testing
Macintosh Business Unit

--
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Please do not send email directly to this e-mail address. It is for
newsgroup purposes only.

Find out everything about Microsoft Mac Newsgroups at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac/community/community.aspx?pid=newsgroups]
Check out product updates and news & info at:
[http://www.microsoft.com/mac]



Strange Thing I went to print the Page refered to in Link. All I could
get was white space about half inch wide at top rest of screen was grey.


I use Mozilla which is standards compliant. Another MS only deal guess
it was written in FrontPage. (which with about 90 percent of web
designers is a swear word. :)

Guess I'll have to open it with IE to print it. :-(


--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, CE.T.

John said:
Hi Phillip:




They do? Word's HTML looks OK in Safari here. A lot of the MVP website is
Word HTML (I know, I am the web author, and when I am running out of time, I
just save the stuff out of Word). Which browser are you using?




Phillip: An small amount of research will show you that this is not true.
If you open an HTML file produced by Word, you will find that the DocType
statement refers to a W3C DTD.

Yes, Microsoft does use ActiveX, which is not available on the Mac and never
will be, and they also make increasing use of dot-Net, which is not yet
available on the Mac.

We are maintaining a vigorous campaign to bring dot-Net to the Mac, and you
could usefully join us in that email bombardment of Redmond. I can tell you
that this will be a long and very vigorous campaign, because porting dot-Net
to the Mac is going to be very seriously expensive. There won't be much
change from $100 million.



Again, you're a little confused. IE on the PC and IE on the Mac are two
different code bases. IE on the Mac had as one of its design goals to be
the most standards-compliant browser of its time, and it achieved that. If
I really want to know whether my non-standard code is going to survive a
standards-compliant browser, I test it in IE 5.2 for the Mac. If IE 5.2 Mac
doesn't complain about the page, neither will anything else that is both
standards-compliant AND of sufficient power to be considered a "mainstream"
browser.

The issue is not usually "standards compliance" in the various "other"
browsers. It's usually that they simply do not have the functionality to
correctly render a website that makes rich use of HTML 4 and CSS 2. They
just don't have the power.


-------------------------snip-------------------------
If they are so standrds compliant explain to be why code created using a
Tool which W3C Standrds compliant can be viewed with no problem In all
Browsers, Including IE Mac/and PC.

Yet Most sites generated designed specifically for IE and not tested on
anything else. works fine in IE but raraly works right in anything else.

If IE would simply remove the code for "Self-Healing" then most sites
would work on any browser, The only sites that wouldn't would be those
that use Active-X.

The reason Mac shuns Active-X other than Mr gates wouldn't let them use
it. Is because 90 percent of all the worms, Viruses, and Trogans and the
world are implimented by Active-X Controls.

They could get rid of "Self-healing" and do the web design world all
over the world a tremedous lot of good. They would make better Web
designers anyway.

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
J

John McGhie

Hi Phillip:

Have you ever thought of moving to Australia? Your logic is totally
upside-down...

If they are so standrds compliant explain to be why code created using a
Tool which W3C Standrds compliant can be viewed with no problem In all
Browsers, Including IE Mac/and PC.

Ummm... Phillip, the issue is "Which" W3C standard... Microsoft HTML tools
can produce compliance to HTML 3, which almost anything can render. But you
have to leave the smarts out.
If IE would simply remove the code for "Self-Healing" then most sites
would work on any browser, The only sites that wouldn't would be those
that use Active-X.

Oh. OK. So you want Microsoft to make the browser used by 98 per cent of
the world "broken" so 100 per cent of the websites in the world have to
recode all their pages to something the minority bowsers can render. I
see...
The reason Mac shuns Active-X other than Mr gates wouldn't let them use
it. Is because 90 percent of all the worms, Viruses, and Trogans and the
world are implimented by Active-X Controls.

This logic is totally upside down, Phillip -- wanna join me in Sydney?

1) Mr Gates used to sell ActiveX to anyone who wants it. He currently
sells its replacement, dot-Net, the same way.

2) 90 per cent of the viruses etc in the world are implemented in VB Script
or VBA. Only a small percentage are actually ActiveX, which is very similar
but distinct. And that's because it's more difficult to get a bad thing
through ActiveX than it is through VBA or VB Script.

3) Mr Gates is taking VBA and ActiveX away, precisely because it was never
designed to be sufficiently secure for the purpose it is now needed for. It
has been replaced by .Net, which was designed from the ground up to be
secure. The only reason VBA is still with us is because users like me, and
the Fortune 500 who have billions invested in legacy code, won't switch :)
They could get rid of "Self-healing" and do the web design world all
over the world a tremedous lot of good. They would make better Web
designers anyway.

{Sigh} I doubt it. They would make "more expensive" web coders. But
better web "designers"? No, I don't see that...

Cheers

--

Please reply to the newsgroup to maintain the thread. Please do not email
me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie <[email protected]>
Consultant Technical Writer
Sydney, Australia +61 4 1209 1410
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top