Page Numbers

L

Lofty Becker

Frequently when I print a document that has in the header

[page] of [total pages]

The [total pages] gets updated one by one, so I get page 1 of 1, page 2
of 2 ... page 49 of 49, page 50 of 50.

I'm sure there's a switch I can throw somewhere that will force the
update before I print. Before I search through all the preferences, does
anyone know where it is?

Thanks in advance

-Lofty
 
B

Bill Weylock

Haven¹t seen that name for many years. You¹re the Lofty Becker whom I
remember from CompuServe days?

Sorry I have no solutions for you. I¹m experiencing erratic behavior of
hyperlinks and bookmarks myself.

If I were you, I think I¹d take the documents to Word 2007 if you have
access to that. You mentioned a PC...

Anyway, good to see your name.


Best,


- Bill


Frequently when I print a document that has in the header

[page] of [total pages]

The [total pages] gets updated one by one, so I get page 1 of 1, page 2
of 2 ... page 49 of 49, page 50 of 50.

I'm sure there's a switch I can throw somewhere that will force the
update before I print. Before I search through all the preferences, does
anyone know where it is?

Thanks in advance

-Lofty

Best,

Bill
Imac 2.8Ghz -10.5.1
Office 2008/2003 - Windows XP Pro SP2
 
D

Daiya Mitchell

The switch you think you are looking for is Word | Preferences | Print
"update fields". Maybe it will help. Also be sure to use Print Preview.

What version of Word are you seeing this in?

I think that's a bug, not a misplaced setting--that I thought used to
only show up on WinWord. There's some possible workarounds listed here.
http://word.mvps.org/faqs/apperrors/pagexofy.htm
 
J

John McGhie

Hi Lofty:

That's a "hardy perennial" in Word, but your post is the first report I have
seen in Mac Word for a very long while :)

One "cure" is to set "Reverse Print Order" in your printer driver.

What is happening is that the { NUMPAGES } field is populated by the
pagination engine. If you allow the document to print "forwards", the
printing subsystem sends the page images to the printer as soon as they are
ready (i.e. As soon as the pagination engine has finished making each page
up).

At that stage, the value of the NUMPAGES field is equal to the PAGE field on
the same page, because the pagination engine hasn't got any further down the
file.

By forcing the printer to print in reverse order, you force the printing
subsystem to wait for the entire file to paginate before sending the first
sheet (which is the last page) to the printer. By that time, Word knows how
many pages there are in the file, and the NUMPAGES field has the correct
value.

The reappearance of this bug indicates that your machine may be struggling
for memory. Pagination should complete at around 50 to 100 pages a second,
which is a bit faster than the printer can swallow them. Try stopping a few
other heavyweight applications before printing, and see if that makes a
difference.

If you can't quit applications, and the Budget Police won't spring for
another stick of memory, you CAN replace the { NUMPAGES } field with a
cross-reference to only the "Page Number" of a "LastPage" bookmark. Hide
the last page bookmark somewhere on the last page where a user won't delete
it by accident.

This effectively forces Word to complete pagination, in order to return a
value for the cross reference, before it can send the first page to the
printer. That way you get the same effect, but the paper comes out the
right way up.

Hope this helps


Frequently when I print a document that has in the header

[page] of [total pages]

The [total pages] gets updated one by one, so I get page 1 of 1, page 2
of 2 ... page 49 of 49, page 50 of 50.

I'm sure there's a switch I can throw somewhere that will force the
update before I print. Before I search through all the preferences, does
anyone know where it is?

Thanks in advance

-Lofty

--
Don't wait for your answer, click here: http://www.word.mvps.org/

Please reply in the group. Please do NOT email me unless I ask you to.

John McGhie, Consultant Technical Writer
+61 4 1209 1410, mailto:[email protected]
McGhie Information Engineering Pty Ltd
http://jgmcghie.fastmail.com.au/
Sydney, Australia. S33°53'34.20 E151°14'54.50
 
L

Lofty Becker

Thanks to all for the suggestions. I'll play around with several and see
which gives the least trouble. (For short documents, print in reverse
order is no problem; for 300 page ones, well....)

Interestingly, I've seen the problem most often on the machine with the
least RAM, so John's memory-related suggestion is spot on. On the other
hand, I _did_ just add a megabyte of RAM to that machine, and I think
that I've still seen the problem. My 2-gig home machine seems relatively
immune.

And Bill ... nice to hear from you, too! Yes, I'm the Lofty Becker from
the old Compuserve days, though a little older and a lot slower. Still
living in Hartford, occasionally see Bob Seaver (he's very sick but
still around) and hear from David Rose (very healthy and as always very
active). And I see Billy Steinberg's credits on the Met Opera
broadcasts, as usual. Don't know how many other Emmys he's picked up.

-Lofty
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top