R
Richard
I have a Grand Canyon hiking website ( http://www.allhikers.com ) with all
pages set to 760 pixels wide in an attempt to accommodate the majority of
people. I recently viewed another hiking site (
http://www.thebeckoning.com/explorations/hikes/backpacking/grandcanyon2007/grandcanyon2007-day1.html
) that had his pages set to over 1000 pixels wide. Obviously that allowed
him to display a series of pictures larger than I can on one line. Does
anyone know what the current statistics show for the percentage of people
still using 800 x 600 display resolution. My intent has always been to not
force people to scroll when viewing my site. However, if the number of users
at 800 x 600 is now fairly low, I may switch my next trip report to a wider
page.
pages set to 760 pixels wide in an attempt to accommodate the majority of
people. I recently viewed another hiking site (
http://www.thebeckoning.com/explorations/hikes/backpacking/grandcanyon2007/grandcanyon2007-day1.html
) that had his pages set to over 1000 pixels wide. Obviously that allowed
him to display a series of pictures larger than I can on one line. Does
anyone know what the current statistics show for the percentage of people
still using 800 x 600 display resolution. My intent has always been to not
force people to scroll when viewing my site. However, if the number of users
at 800 x 600 is now fairly low, I may switch my next trip report to a wider
page.