Palatino Line Height Different on Mac vs. Windows?

V

Vik Rubenfeld

I find that Palatino takes up more line height on Windows machines than
it does on a Mac. Pages in Word files, using Palatino, that are correct
on a Mac are wrong when opened on a PC.

Is there a way to fix this, so that the lines take up the same height on
both systems?

If not, are there similar fonts that take up the same line height on
both systems?

Thanks in advance for any info.

-Vik
 
C

Clive Huggan

Vik,

For my body text I use fonts (including Palatino) in 11 point size, at a
line spacing of "at least 13 points". I'm fairly sure that produces the same
number of lines per page on Windows and Mac in Palatino (it was a while back
that I did the comparisons) -- give this a try.

The more open spacing and slightly smaller font in the 11 / 13 specification
is more easily readable on the printed page than 12 point and single line
spacing, and it looks good on screen at 110%.

Post back if you need specifications for this style -- don't bother to apply
them manually.

For fonts that retain the same pagination on Macs and PCs, see the article
at
www.microsoft.com/mac/wordx/wordx_main.asp?embfpath=featartx&embfname=wd_cro
ssplatform.asp

The upshot of this article is that despite their similar appearance, the
standard Macintosh TrueType fonts (Times, Helvetica, and Courier) are
actually quite different from the standard Windows fonts (Times New Roman,
Arial, and Courier New). These fonts come from broadly the same font
families, but the font metrics of the font sets are different. Even a very
short document that uses these fonts can exhibit noticeable change in
pagination when you move it to the other platform, and long documents can
display a considerable amount of change.

Word for the Macintosh uses Microsoft¹s TrueType font set for the Macintosh,
including Times New Roman, Arial, Courier New, and Wingdings. These are the
same TrueType fonts that come with Microsoft Windows. This offers a
consistent base set of fonts for every Word user, minimizing font-mapping
difficulties when you cross platforms.

For a broader discussion of interchangeability of documents between
computers, see Appendix A of "Bend Word to your Will", downloadable from the
MVPs¹ website (www.mvps.org/word/FAQs/WordMac/Bend/BendWord.htm).

-- Clive Huggan
Canberra, Australia
============================================================
* Please post all comments or follow-on questions to the newsgroup for the
benefit of others who may be interested.

* If you post a question, keep re-visiting the newsgroup for a few days
after the first response comes in. Sometimes it takes a few responses before
the best or complete solution is proposed, and sometimes you'll be asked for
further information so that a better answer can be provided. Good tips about
getting the best out of posting are at
http://www.mvps.org/word/FindHelp/Posting.htm

* Remove the uppercase letters from my address above if you need to send an
e-mail to me directly (although that would be exceptional). Please note
that e-mails with an attachment will be automatically rejected.

* If anyone is still reading down this far, here's a question: is it time
for you to back up your Normal template and all your Word settings files?
(This should be on a medium other than the internal hard drive and, if you
also want to protect against theft and fire, stored in a different
building.)
============================================================
 
P

Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.

Vik said:
I find that Palatino takes up more line height on Windows machines than
it does on a Mac. Pages in Word files, using Palatino, that are correct
on a Mac are wrong when opened on a PC.

Is there a way to fix this, so that the lines take up the same height on
both systems?

If not, are there similar fonts that take up the same line height on
both systems?

Thanks in advance for any info.

-Vik


IMHO I believe that the problem between Fonts using the same name on Mac and
windows has to do with the fact that Mac's for the most part up until recently
were based on a 72dpi format while PC's use 96 or even 100 DPI ((rarely) format.

a PC font would show up 72/96th as tall on the Mac. and a Mac font show up as
96/72nd as much on the PC. Throws off line spacing and line breaks.

Now ith the advent of OSX and its UNIX Engine, UNIX also uses 96 dpi. So if a
system dfont of the same size should show up identical on the mac and the PC.
Been my experience.

But this is my opinion. <asbestos suit to the ready - prepared to be shot down>
:)

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phillip M. Jones, CET |MEMBER:VPEA (LIFE) ETA-I, NESDA,ISCET, Sterling
616 Liberty Street |Who's Who. PHONE:276-632-5045, FAX:276-632-0868
Martinsville Va 24112-1809 |[email protected], ICQ11269732, AIM pjonescet
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it's "fixed", don't "break it"!

mailto:p[email protected]

<http://www.kimbanet.com/~pjones/default.htm>
<http://home.kimbanet.com/~pjones/birthday/index.htm>
<http://vpea.exis.net>
 
C

Clive Huggan

IMHO I believe that the problem between Fonts using the same name on Mac and
windows has to do with the fact that Mac's for the most part up until recently
were based on a 72dpi format while PC's use 96 or even 100 DPI ((rarely)
format.

a PC font would show up 72/96th as tall on the Mac. and a Mac font show up as
96/72nd as much on the PC. Throws off line spacing and line breaks.

Now ith the advent of OSX and its UNIX Engine, UNIX also uses 96 dpi. So if a
system dfont of the same size should show up identical on the mac and the PC.
Been my experience.

But this is my opinion. <asbestos suit to the ready - prepared to be shot
down>
:)

Yes, I'm on OS 9 and Word 2001 -- I should have mentioned that. So I can't
comment on Phillip's remarks -- I'm too ignorant, though I'm learning!

Irrespective, it would be good to have your feedback, Vik, on whether the
11/13 line spacing suggestion met your needs and/or whether you're on OS X.
If the latter, it would be handy to know the font manufacturer and type of
font you're using for Palatino -- someone (not me, since I'm pre-OS X) would
then be able to give more advice, I'd expect.

Cheers,

Clive Huggan
 
C

Clive Huggan

Yes, I'm on OS 9 and Word 2001 -- I should have mentioned that. So I can't
comment on Phillip's remarks -- I'm too ignorant, though I'm learning!

Irrespective, it would be good to have your feedback, Vik, on whether the
11/13 line spacing suggestion met your needs and/or whether you're on OS X.
If the latter, it would be handy to know the font manufacturer and type of
font you're using for Palatino -- someone (not me, since I'm pre-OS X) would
then be able to give more advice, I'd expect.

Cheers,

Clive Huggan
Vik,

Someone has just pointed out that they could not get to the Microsoft
article:

www.microsoft.com/mac/wordx/wordx_main.asp?embfpath=featartx&embfname=wd_cro
ssplatform.asp

which I mentioned as a source of info on cross-platform font compatibility
earlier in this thread.

You might like to look at how I responded in article
BC270287.26AD%[email protected] in this newsgroup
(subject: Re: UPDATE -- Re: Word unexpectedly quits - TEST RESULTS).

Clive Huggan
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top