B
babyboyfloyd469
My document is severely screwed up, I am senind it to you so you can see what
is happenin. I have tried everything I can to recover this document but I
cannot. I need to know what to do because it has to be turned in today.
Please help A.S.A.P.
¥à 5@ ð ¿ ï
bjbjÃ2Ã2 " ÂX ÂX ï
ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ˆ
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 œ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤
°
œ ¶ È È È È È È È È
• — — — — — — $ Ì R ~
» 2 µ È È µ
µ » 2 2 È È à 7
7 7 µ " 2 È 2 È • 7
µ • 7
7 I 2 2
I È ¼
à N®p ÃÃ… ¤ × I • æ 0 I
œ ó : œ I F 4 z " 2 2
2 2 œ 2 I L È " ê
7 Ÿ È È È
» » œ œ d ¤ -
Å“ Å“
eady mentioned, I feel
that it is structural evidence. The U.S. Government is a structure. The
piece of evidence itself mentions “… the Japanese could continue the (whale)
hunts until 1988…†Again, the problem will continue to exist, making it
inherency.
5. I feel that example five is non-topical. I didn’t see how the evidence
and the tag tied together, nor did I see how either tied in to the
resolution. The resolution and the tag talk about public work programs. The
evidence discusses distress selling of productive assets.
6. The evidence, “According to a study published in summer 2004, nearly
half of unemployed people have remained outside the open labor market for
over two years. This, the study concludes, cannot be explained by individual
background variables used in conventional statistics, or as being a heritage
of the early 1990s recession. Instead, rapid structural changes in labor
demand tin the course of the 1990s appears to have caused the problem. The
skills of many people have become outdated,†shows that we are dealing with a
social significance. The fact that people’s skills are outdated is the harm.
This is a problem that deals with society, making it a social harm.
7. The tag for example seven, “Structural unemployment is resistant to
being changed,†shows that that this is an example of inherency. If the
problem is resistant to being changed, then it will not improve, making it
inherent. In the tag, it also calls it “structural unemployment,†which
proves that this is an issue of structural inherency. In the evidence, it
says, “Structural unemployment is the hardest sort of unemployment to cure
because it is caused by the structure of an economy…†The economy is the
structure in this stock issue.
8. The piece of evidence, “Most police departments in the United States,
most prosecutors advising their local l aw enforcement officials, and most
courts deciding pre-trial questions of admissibility, persist in the
antiquated practice of pretrial swearing contests. This tradition continues
notwithstanding the repeated criticism, the document cases of physical and
psychological confessions reported by police from the interrogation room.
The simple straightforward precaution of videotaping the interrogation
sessions is steadfastly rejected by police and courts in most American
jurisdictions.†Is an example of traditional harm. It is the harm because it
is what creates the problem; however it does not cause the problem to
continue. It is traditional because it says in the evidence, “…This
tradition continues notwithstanding the repeated criticism…†This proves the
evidence to be traditional.
9. The tag, “VTI will decrease false confessions and save innocent people
because it creates a totality of circumstances,†shows that this is solvency.
It says in the tag that false confessions will decrease, which will improve
the current situation. The evidence also says, “In the 1980’s and 90’s,
research by Saul Kassin, Richard Ofshe, and Richard Leo has confirmed that
the common psychological interrogation techniques can erode a suspect’s
resistance to the point that even an innocent person will conclude that
confession is both a rational choice and the best option. Leo and Ofshe
concluded in their study that electronic recordings of interrogations are the
only viable way to combat the power that these confessions have in the
courtroom because they allow fact finders, prosecutors, and the experts to
determine for themselves the reliability of the confession. Only by
understanding the circumstances under which the statement was made and
viewing the suspect’s ‘post admission narrative of the crime’, can those in
the courtroom understand the extent of the defendant’s actual culpability.â€
This will also help solve the problem so that the jury and judges will know
at what state of mind a person confessed, and whether he or she was being
truthful or had been broken down.
10. The tenth example of evidence, “As a former prosecutor, I had some
serious reservations about requiring police interviews to be taped,
Blagejevich said in a statement. ‘However, when there is a system that can
allow an innocent person to be sent to death now based on a questionable
confession, we have a moral obligation to intervene’.†is an example of moral
significance. The evidence shows the harm, it is the problem. The tag says,
“We have a moral obligation to implement VTI.†This proves that the harm is
moral.
11. The evidence, “Jimmy Sipes was the first well- known CCA victims. The
Sipes case was eventually settled by most of the defendants for $667,000, but
one defendant, Osmose Wood Preserving, chose to go to trial. They lost their
product liability case and the jury awarded another $100,000 to Sipes,
bringing the total amount awarded in his case to $767,000,†is an example of
quantitative harm.
is happenin. I have tried everything I can to recover this document but I
cannot. I need to know what to do because it has to be turned in today.
Please help A.S.A.P.
¥à 5@ ð ¿ ï
bjbjÃ2Ã2 " ÂX ÂX ï
ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ ˆ
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 œ ¤
¤ ¤ ¤
°
œ ¶ È È È È È È È È
• — — — — — — $ Ì R ~
» 2 µ È È µ
µ » 2 2 È È à 7
7 7 µ " 2 È 2 È • 7
µ • 7
7 I 2 2
I È ¼
à N®p ÃÃ… ¤ × I • æ 0 I
œ ó : œ I F 4 z " 2 2
2 2 œ 2 I L È " ê
7 Ÿ È È È
» » œ œ d ¤ -
Å“ Å“
eady mentioned, I feel
that it is structural evidence. The U.S. Government is a structure. The
piece of evidence itself mentions “… the Japanese could continue the (whale)
hunts until 1988…†Again, the problem will continue to exist, making it
inherency.
5. I feel that example five is non-topical. I didn’t see how the evidence
and the tag tied together, nor did I see how either tied in to the
resolution. The resolution and the tag talk about public work programs. The
evidence discusses distress selling of productive assets.
6. The evidence, “According to a study published in summer 2004, nearly
half of unemployed people have remained outside the open labor market for
over two years. This, the study concludes, cannot be explained by individual
background variables used in conventional statistics, or as being a heritage
of the early 1990s recession. Instead, rapid structural changes in labor
demand tin the course of the 1990s appears to have caused the problem. The
skills of many people have become outdated,†shows that we are dealing with a
social significance. The fact that people’s skills are outdated is the harm.
This is a problem that deals with society, making it a social harm.
7. The tag for example seven, “Structural unemployment is resistant to
being changed,†shows that that this is an example of inherency. If the
problem is resistant to being changed, then it will not improve, making it
inherent. In the tag, it also calls it “structural unemployment,†which
proves that this is an issue of structural inherency. In the evidence, it
says, “Structural unemployment is the hardest sort of unemployment to cure
because it is caused by the structure of an economy…†The economy is the
structure in this stock issue.
8. The piece of evidence, “Most police departments in the United States,
most prosecutors advising their local l aw enforcement officials, and most
courts deciding pre-trial questions of admissibility, persist in the
antiquated practice of pretrial swearing contests. This tradition continues
notwithstanding the repeated criticism, the document cases of physical and
psychological confessions reported by police from the interrogation room.
The simple straightforward precaution of videotaping the interrogation
sessions is steadfastly rejected by police and courts in most American
jurisdictions.†Is an example of traditional harm. It is the harm because it
is what creates the problem; however it does not cause the problem to
continue. It is traditional because it says in the evidence, “…This
tradition continues notwithstanding the repeated criticism…†This proves the
evidence to be traditional.
9. The tag, “VTI will decrease false confessions and save innocent people
because it creates a totality of circumstances,†shows that this is solvency.
It says in the tag that false confessions will decrease, which will improve
the current situation. The evidence also says, “In the 1980’s and 90’s,
research by Saul Kassin, Richard Ofshe, and Richard Leo has confirmed that
the common psychological interrogation techniques can erode a suspect’s
resistance to the point that even an innocent person will conclude that
confession is both a rational choice and the best option. Leo and Ofshe
concluded in their study that electronic recordings of interrogations are the
only viable way to combat the power that these confessions have in the
courtroom because they allow fact finders, prosecutors, and the experts to
determine for themselves the reliability of the confession. Only by
understanding the circumstances under which the statement was made and
viewing the suspect’s ‘post admission narrative of the crime’, can those in
the courtroom understand the extent of the defendant’s actual culpability.â€
This will also help solve the problem so that the jury and judges will know
at what state of mind a person confessed, and whether he or she was being
truthful or had been broken down.
10. The tenth example of evidence, “As a former prosecutor, I had some
serious reservations about requiring police interviews to be taped,
Blagejevich said in a statement. ‘However, when there is a system that can
allow an innocent person to be sent to death now based on a questionable
confession, we have a moral obligation to intervene’.†is an example of moral
significance. The evidence shows the harm, it is the problem. The tag says,
“We have a moral obligation to implement VTI.†This proves that the harm is
moral.
11. The evidence, “Jimmy Sipes was the first well- known CCA victims. The
Sipes case was eventually settled by most of the defendants for $667,000, but
one defendant, Osmose Wood Preserving, chose to go to trial. They lost their
product liability case and the jury awarded another $100,000 to Sipes,
bringing the total amount awarded in his case to $767,000,†is an example of
quantitative harm.