.pps or .ppt

L

Lynn

I have always used the Pack N Go option (.ppt) on finalized presentations
creating both one with and one without the viewer for users. Is it better to
use the Pack N Go or just save as a .pps file?
 
E

Echo Swinford

I have always used the Pack N Go option (.ppt) on finalized presentations
creating both one with and one without the viewer for users. Is it better to
use the Pack N Go or just save as a .pps file?

I usually prefer to save as PPS, but it depends on how I'm
distributing and what version of PPT my recipients have available.

Echo
Echo [MS PPT MVP]
http://www.echosvoice.com
 
L

Lynn

With choosing the PPS format versus the Pack n Go route wouldn't the end user
have to have PowerPoint or the Viewer installed to view a PPS file?

I ran into the problem today of a MAC user not being able to unpack either
option. Should PPS be used when sending presentations to MAC users or should
MAC users also be able to unpack?

Echo Swinford said:
I have always used the Pack N Go option (.ppt) on finalized presentations
creating both one with and one without the viewer for users. Is it better to
use the Pack N Go or just save as a .pps file?

I usually prefer to save as PPS, but it depends on how I'm
distributing and what version of PPT my recipients have available.

Echo
Echo [MS PPT MVP]
http://www.echosvoice.com
 
E

Echo S

Lynn said:
With choosing the PPS format versus the Pack n Go route wouldn't the end user
have to have PowerPoint or the Viewer installed to view a PPS file?
Yes.

I ran into the problem today of a MAC user not being able to unpack either
option. Should PPS be used when sending presentations to MAC users or should
MAC users also be able to unpack?

What Steve said.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top