P
Pawel
I use Data Analysis in PS 2007 extensively and once again I came across a
problem. I hope someone of you, distinguished group visitors, will shed some
light on it.
We created a DA view (basing on the Timesheet cube) to verify that everyone
filled their timesheets. it is used at the end of the month and thanks to it
we can very easily see any discrepancies from the assumed value (which
normally is a sign that someone had made a mistake in his/her timesheet or
just forgot to fill it).
Unfortunately, it works only for "standard" timesheets - if a surrogate
timesheet is used, all the hours are accounted not for the owner of the
timesheet (e.g. a programmer), but for the timesheet creator (a manager who
created the surrogate TS).
I spent many hours trying to dig out what happens (even directlyy analyzing
the OPS database and cube definitions), but I found no easy solution for the
problem and the complexity of the analysis strucures exceeded my mental
capacities
Does anyone have any clues on what is the problem? Is it an OPS bug (which
would give hope that eventually it will be corrected), or a kind of weird
feature I do not understand?
Or maybe I just use this cube in a non-standard way?
Thanks in advance,
Pawel
problem. I hope someone of you, distinguished group visitors, will shed some
light on it.
We created a DA view (basing on the Timesheet cube) to verify that everyone
filled their timesheets. it is used at the end of the month and thanks to it
we can very easily see any discrepancies from the assumed value (which
normally is a sign that someone had made a mistake in his/her timesheet or
just forgot to fill it).
Unfortunately, it works only for "standard" timesheets - if a surrogate
timesheet is used, all the hours are accounted not for the owner of the
timesheet (e.g. a programmer), but for the timesheet creator (a manager who
created the surrogate TS).
I spent many hours trying to dig out what happens (even directlyy analyzing
the OPS database and cube definitions), but I found no easy solution for the
problem and the complexity of the analysis strucures exceeded my mental
capacities
Does anyone have any clues on what is the problem? Is it an OPS bug (which
would give hope that eventually it will be corrected), or a kind of weird
feature I do not understand?
Or maybe I just use this cube in a non-standard way?
Thanks in advance,
Pawel