D
David Bartosik - MS MVP
From: Reno Davenport
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:12 AM
To: davidbartosik.com
David,
I tried creating and editing the site in Pub2003, saving it as a Pub2000
file, and putting up the site. Works great. If you look at
www.upstagers.com, I created and added the "Before and After 3" page in
Pub03 and then moved the entire site to Pub2k and published it. The
difference in size is beyond belief! I can reload via FTP my entire site in
under 2 minutes versus the 4 hours it was going to take with 2003. There is
something fundamentally wrong in Pub03 when it creates these hugh files for
no net gain for the average user. It is nice that you can do incremental
updates with Pub03, but there is no value in that if you compare file sizes
and load times.
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 11:12 AM
To: davidbartosik.com
David,
I tried creating and editing the site in Pub2003, saving it as a Pub2000
file, and putting up the site. Works great. If you look at
www.upstagers.com, I created and added the "Before and After 3" page in
Pub03 and then moved the entire site to Pub2k and published it. The
difference in size is beyond belief! I can reload via FTP my entire site in
under 2 minutes versus the 4 hours it was going to take with 2003. There is
something fundamentally wrong in Pub03 when it creates these hugh files for
no net gain for the average user. It is nice that you can do incremental
updates with Pub03, but there is no value in that if you compare file sizes
and load times.