G
G.R. Toro
Hi,
I want to create a numeric field code, where I can specify the field name
and control the format. What I want is to number tasks sequentially, as
follows:
Task 1. Ttile
task description blah blah
Task 2. Ttile
task description blah blah
(and I am trying to use field codes to update the task numbers)
I have been using LISTNUM with my own field name "task", but it does not let
me control the format (it always follows the field number with a
parenthesis, which I don't want). It seems that the format is predefined
for the "NumberDefault", "OutlineDefault", and "LegalDefault" names, but the
documentation does not say how user-defined names are handled.
Is there a way I can control the format for my used-defined field name?
Also, the LISTNUM values seem to change when I do any re-formatting of lists
elsewhere within the document.
More generally, which field code is best for a user-defined field (i.e.,
which one gives the user more control and breaks less often)? I have been
trying SEQ and AUTONUMLGL, but they seem to have limitations.
Thanks,
Gabriel
I want to create a numeric field code, where I can specify the field name
and control the format. What I want is to number tasks sequentially, as
follows:
Task 1. Ttile
task description blah blah
Task 2. Ttile
task description blah blah
(and I am trying to use field codes to update the task numbers)
I have been using LISTNUM with my own field name "task", but it does not let
me control the format (it always follows the field number with a
parenthesis, which I don't want). It seems that the format is predefined
for the "NumberDefault", "OutlineDefault", and "LegalDefault" names, but the
documentation does not say how user-defined names are handled.
Is there a way I can control the format for my used-defined field name?
Also, the LISTNUM values seem to change when I do any re-formatting of lists
elsewhere within the document.
More generally, which field code is best for a user-defined field (i.e.,
which one gives the user more control and breaks less often)? I have been
trying SEQ and AUTONUMLGL, but they seem to have limitations.
Thanks,
Gabriel