H
Heather
I'm pretty sure the answer is already no, but I thought I'd ask...
I have logic to insert into a REALLY big merge. A particular indicator
may appear in one of ten fields that would mean a mismatch in the type
of letter being sent (we're accounting for the chance of human error).
If a mismatch is found, I'm including a big line of text to alert staff
not to mail the letter.
I have this:
{if {mergefield evaluationcd11}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd12}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd13}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd14}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd15}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd16}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd17}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd18}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd19}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd110}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
I don't suppose it's possible to say mergefields 11 through 110 without
needing all of those if statements, is it? The 'FN' code would only be
in one field, but not regularly in, say, cd11 or cd 12.
Thanks in advance for any advice...go live is in two weeks and
counting!
Heather
I have logic to insert into a REALLY big merge. A particular indicator
may appear in one of ten fields that would mean a mismatch in the type
of letter being sent (we're accounting for the chance of human error).
If a mismatch is found, I'm including a big line of text to alert staff
not to mail the letter.
I have this:
{if {mergefield evaluationcd11}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd12}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd13}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd14}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd15}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd16}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd17}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd18}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd19}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
{if {mergefield evaluationcd110}="FN" {includetext
c:\\master_comment.doc letter_type_mismatch}""}
I don't suppose it's possible to say mergefields 11 through 110 without
needing all of those if statements, is it? The 'FN' code would only be
in one field, but not regularly in, say, cd11 or cd 12.
Thanks in advance for any advice...go live is in two weeks and
counting!
Heather