B
Brian
Pos Name Score Shoot-off Total New Pos
1 Black B 100 20 120 2
2 Henderson R 100 25 125 1
3 Smith J 99 3
4 Jones H 98 23 121 5
5 Rossouw N 98 24 122 4
6 Harington D 96 6
7 Ieul P 94 23 117 7
8 Tait M 94 21 115 9
9 Els N 94 22 116 8
10 Murray R 92 10
The table above is used for a competition. Only those with tied
scores compete in a shoot-off. I need the formula for the last
column to determine the final ranking. It is important to note that
where position 1 and 2 have the same score, after the shoot-off they
can only be re-ranked in position 1 or 2 irrespective of the fact that
those in positions 4 and 5 have a higher score after the shoot-off.
The same applies with other tied scores.
1 Black B 100 20 120 2
2 Henderson R 100 25 125 1
3 Smith J 99 3
4 Jones H 98 23 121 5
5 Rossouw N 98 24 122 4
6 Harington D 96 6
7 Ieul P 94 23 117 7
8 Tait M 94 21 115 9
9 Els N 94 22 116 8
10 Murray R 92 10
The table above is used for a competition. Only those with tied
scores compete in a shoot-off. I need the formula for the last
column to determine the final ranking. It is important to note that
where position 1 and 2 have the same score, after the shoot-off they
can only be re-ranked in position 1 or 2 irrespective of the fact that
those in positions 4 and 5 have a higher score after the shoot-off.
The same applies with other tied scores.