S
StargateFanFromWork
That's understandable. But what if we need an autonumbering type of number
that corresponds to a tab in a binder - and the Access db is partly to make
up an index sheet of that and many other binders. It's gotten to be too
much to do in Excel. We need a better system and Access is so much easier
once it's been set up.
Let's say I have record #1 as that's the first one I input in that table.
The user then know that that data is under tab #1 in a particular binder.
If we're not to use, or shouldn't use, the record ID #, what can be used
instead of this? If I have 100 records and we delete one or two, if
autonumbering can't be relied upon anymore because of that type of thing,
how would autonumbering another field help? Or is there a numbering method
that wouldn't rely on this particular Access feature, but perhaps could be
generated as next-in-line no matter what records lost in a crash or deleted,
etc.
I hope people are understanding what I mean. In Excel, if we delete a row,
we would just replace it with another # and place the data in the
corresponding tab. Deleted rows are not a problem and having items out of
order are not either. We then sort by the data so that it is in
alphanumeric order. The user or others just go to the appropriate tab in
the binder.
that corresponds to a tab in a binder - and the Access db is partly to make
up an index sheet of that and many other binders. It's gotten to be too
much to do in Excel. We need a better system and Access is so much easier
once it's been set up.
Let's say I have record #1 as that's the first one I input in that table.
The user then know that that data is under tab #1 in a particular binder.
If we're not to use, or shouldn't use, the record ID #, what can be used
instead of this? If I have 100 records and we delete one or two, if
autonumbering can't be relied upon anymore because of that type of thing,
how would autonumbering another field help? Or is there a numbering method
that wouldn't rely on this particular Access feature, but perhaps could be
generated as next-in-line no matter what records lost in a crash or deleted,
etc.
I hope people are understanding what I mean. In Excel, if we delete a row,
we would just replace it with another # and place the data in the
corresponding tab. Deleted rows are not a problem and having items out of
order are not either. We then sort by the data so that it is in
alphanumeric order. The user or others just go to the appropriate tab in
the binder.