B
Brian Smith
I have followed Microsoft's Security FAQ paper, Section 33 to create a
remote site administrator workgroup file. Everything seems to be fine except
for one thing. Since it is impossible to get rid of the Admin user and the
Site Administrator account has the ability to assign users to different
groups, as well as clear passwords, what is to prevent the Site
Administrator from giving the Admin user access to other groups, clearing
the password for Admin and giving the database to other people? I have taken
all permissions away from the Users and Admins Groups but I do have other
groups that can read/write data. Is there a way to prevent this from
happening? Also, would it be possible via code to check if the current user
is logged on as Admin and then create a new password, which would hopefully
stop them from using the application a second time?
One last question, when I created the remote workgroup file I notice that
the owner of all objects is now listed as <Unknown>. Is this the way it
should be?
I'd really appreciate if you one of you security gurus could shed some light
on the above for me.
Thanks.
Brian
remote site administrator workgroup file. Everything seems to be fine except
for one thing. Since it is impossible to get rid of the Admin user and the
Site Administrator account has the ability to assign users to different
groups, as well as clear passwords, what is to prevent the Site
Administrator from giving the Admin user access to other groups, clearing
the password for Admin and giving the database to other people? I have taken
all permissions away from the Users and Admins Groups but I do have other
groups that can read/write data. Is there a way to prevent this from
happening? Also, would it be possible via code to check if the current user
is logged on as Admin and then create a new password, which would hopefully
stop them from using the application a second time?
One last question, when I created the remote workgroup file I notice that
the owner of all objects is now listed as <Unknown>. Is this the way it
should be?
I'd really appreciate if you one of you security gurus could shed some light
on the above for me.
Thanks.
Brian