S
sgunther
The MOD function exibits an error.
Start with 8 in A1
Increnet A2 to A32 by 0.1; (A2=A1+0.1) (A3=A2+0.1)
Bx = INT(Ax); (B2 = INT(A2)) (B3 = INT(A3))
Cx = MOD(Ax,1); (C2 = MOD(A2,1))(C3 = MOD(A3,1))
Notice that when Column A = 9, 10, and 11 that MOD exibits errors;
For A=9, MOD= -3.55271E-15
For A=10, MOD= 1
For A=11, MOD= -1.06581E-14
But if you manually do an MOD(9) or MOD(10) or MOD(11) you get the correct
results.
The INT function fails in the above when;
For A=10, INT= 9
But if you manually do an INT(10) you get the correct results.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...0011e58&dg=microsoft.public.excel.crashesgpfs
Start with 8 in A1
Increnet A2 to A32 by 0.1; (A2=A1+0.1) (A3=A2+0.1)
Bx = INT(Ax); (B2 = INT(A2)) (B3 = INT(A3))
Cx = MOD(Ax,1); (C2 = MOD(A2,1))(C3 = MOD(A3,1))
Notice that when Column A = 9, 10, and 11 that MOD exibits errors;
For A=9, MOD= -3.55271E-15
For A=10, MOD= 1
For A=11, MOD= -1.06581E-14
But if you manually do an MOD(9) or MOD(10) or MOD(11) you get the correct
results.
The INT function fails in the above when;
For A=10, INT= 9
But if you manually do an INT(10) you get the correct results.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...0011e58&dg=microsoft.public.excel.crashesgpfs