E
EcoLeAnne
No lie, I am literally weeping in frustration. I apologize for the repeated
postings. I swear, I have done my best to solve this on my own, I have
attempted to implement 1 suggestion I received via this ng (unbound form
w/combo & listbox instead of subform), I have repeatedly built up and torn
down form after form, I have rent my garments and gnashed my teeth, and STILL
I cannot accomplish what would seem to be a fairly simple form design.
Other than early onset Alzheimer's, the only reason I can think of for my
difficulties would be the trickiness of multiple many-to-many relationships
in my db. I have 4 tables, 3 of which are related M:M from a relational
database standpoint: tblWatersheds, tblGoals, tblObjectives. The 4th table,
tblWatershedsGoalsObjs, is the "resolver." The "resolver" contains ONLY its
own pk and the fk's from the other tables...no other fields. All data are
largely static...IOW, I'm not doing data entry, I just want to view stuff in
the tables in a certain way. Now, from a human standpoint, the entity
relationships are less complex: ea. watershed has one or more goals, ea. of
which have one or more objectives associated with them. That is the point of
view from which I'm trying to approach this form. What I want is something
like the Customer Orders form in the N'winds db: a main form that displays
Watersheds; some kind of control (combobox, listbox, subform...it doesn't
matter) that is linked to the main form and displays the goals assigned to
the selected watershed when clicked or whatever; and a second control
(preferably a subform) linked to the main form AND the goal control that
lists the objectives associated with ea. selected watershed + goal. Every!
Single! example I have found in books and on the www is based on 1:M
relationships between the tables; none of the example scenarios seem to work
with M:M. I assumed that once I set up my relationships correctly (and I'm
fairly sure they are), Access would be able to figure out what to do. Boy,
was I wrong. Please, pleeeeaaaassssse help. I'm getting quite desperate.
Many tia,
postings. I swear, I have done my best to solve this on my own, I have
attempted to implement 1 suggestion I received via this ng (unbound form
w/combo & listbox instead of subform), I have repeatedly built up and torn
down form after form, I have rent my garments and gnashed my teeth, and STILL
I cannot accomplish what would seem to be a fairly simple form design.
Other than early onset Alzheimer's, the only reason I can think of for my
difficulties would be the trickiness of multiple many-to-many relationships
in my db. I have 4 tables, 3 of which are related M:M from a relational
database standpoint: tblWatersheds, tblGoals, tblObjectives. The 4th table,
tblWatershedsGoalsObjs, is the "resolver." The "resolver" contains ONLY its
own pk and the fk's from the other tables...no other fields. All data are
largely static...IOW, I'm not doing data entry, I just want to view stuff in
the tables in a certain way. Now, from a human standpoint, the entity
relationships are less complex: ea. watershed has one or more goals, ea. of
which have one or more objectives associated with them. That is the point of
view from which I'm trying to approach this form. What I want is something
like the Customer Orders form in the N'winds db: a main form that displays
Watersheds; some kind of control (combobox, listbox, subform...it doesn't
matter) that is linked to the main form and displays the goals assigned to
the selected watershed when clicked or whatever; and a second control
(preferably a subform) linked to the main form AND the goal control that
lists the objectives associated with ea. selected watershed + goal. Every!
Single! example I have found in books and on the www is based on 1:M
relationships between the tables; none of the example scenarios seem to work
with M:M. I assumed that once I set up my relationships correctly (and I'm
fairly sure they are), Access would be able to figure out what to do. Boy,
was I wrong. Please, pleeeeaaaassssse help. I'm getting quite desperate.
Many tia,