C
ChillyChe
Okay, I'm sure people have complained about and lauded the new ribbon
interface. Frankly, I'm skeptical, but think it's a bold step away from
menus.
Either way, there are two glaring problems with the interface as it stands.
1) I can't drag an item from the ribbon into the quick-access toolbar
thingy. WHAT? Why not? Isn't that far more intuitive than clicking the
office start menu thingy, then going to word options then meandering down to
customize then having to sift through a MENU-esque palette to find the
options and then add to the customized tool-bar?
I'm an Avid Media Composer editor, and we can customize our keyboards by
simply dragging buttons out of a command palette into our keyboard. That's
been a feature since as long as I've been using Avids.
2) Why isn't spell check on the HOME tab for the ribbon? Seriously, that's
got to be a more commonly used command (along with thesaurus) than styles.
No, whereas a single mouse click could activate my spellcheck in 2003, in
2007 I have to click twice to get there. That's lame. Now, I've just added
it to my quick access toolbar, but honestly, should I even need that?
2.5) Styles takes up about half of the ribbon real-estate here. I've never
used that junk in my life. A far superior design would allow me to customize
fully what options were in my HOME tab in the ribbon. It's MY HOME after
all, right? Each GROUP looks like it should be undockable, and that I should
be able to mix and match these things. WITHOUT WRITING ANY SCRIPT, PLEASE.
Anyway. If you want to make an intuitive user experience, which all this
bubbly post apple design seem to indicate, then you have to make it fully
customizable.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...b605a5&dg=microsoft.public.word.docmanagement
interface. Frankly, I'm skeptical, but think it's a bold step away from
menus.
Either way, there are two glaring problems with the interface as it stands.
1) I can't drag an item from the ribbon into the quick-access toolbar
thingy. WHAT? Why not? Isn't that far more intuitive than clicking the
office start menu thingy, then going to word options then meandering down to
customize then having to sift through a MENU-esque palette to find the
options and then add to the customized tool-bar?
I'm an Avid Media Composer editor, and we can customize our keyboards by
simply dragging buttons out of a command palette into our keyboard. That's
been a feature since as long as I've been using Avids.
2) Why isn't spell check on the HOME tab for the ribbon? Seriously, that's
got to be a more commonly used command (along with thesaurus) than styles.
No, whereas a single mouse click could activate my spellcheck in 2003, in
2007 I have to click twice to get there. That's lame. Now, I've just added
it to my quick access toolbar, but honestly, should I even need that?
2.5) Styles takes up about half of the ribbon real-estate here. I've never
used that junk in my life. A far superior design would allow me to customize
fully what options were in my HOME tab in the ribbon. It's MY HOME after
all, right? Each GROUP looks like it should be undockable, and that I should
be able to mix and match these things. WITHOUT WRITING ANY SCRIPT, PLEASE.
Anyway. If you want to make an intuitive user experience, which all this
bubbly post apple design seem to indicate, then you have to make it fully
customizable.
----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://www.microsoft.com/office/com...b605a5&dg=microsoft.public.word.docmanagement