B
Brightbelt
Hi-
I'm on Windows XP Pro, FP 2003, with Pentium 4, 1 GB
ddr ram. This is about a site I've mentioned earlier in a
different post: http://www.frankbright.com . I have the
piano navigation graphic (made with ImageReady) in a
shared border, and the rollovers work great browsing in
Netscape (on my computer), but on IE (on my computer),
they are very sluggish and slow to respond. If anybody
could test it out on their browser(s) as a "reality"
check, it would be great. I've tried it on my laptop and
they are very sluggish there with IE as well. Btw, I'm
referring to real browsing. In all browser previews (in
FP and ImageReady), it responds very well.
Is there any way I can improve it's responsiveness ?
I'm not a coder, so I know my options may be limited. I'd
love to find a way to keep this graphic. FP estimates the
download time of my homepage as 25 seconds on 28k, which
sounds pretty good to me. Any help is great. Many
Thanks,...Brightbelt
I'm on Windows XP Pro, FP 2003, with Pentium 4, 1 GB
ddr ram. This is about a site I've mentioned earlier in a
different post: http://www.frankbright.com . I have the
piano navigation graphic (made with ImageReady) in a
shared border, and the rollovers work great browsing in
Netscape (on my computer), but on IE (on my computer),
they are very sluggish and slow to respond. If anybody
could test it out on their browser(s) as a "reality"
check, it would be great. I've tried it on my laptop and
they are very sluggish there with IE as well. Btw, I'm
referring to real browsing. In all browser previews (in
FP and ImageReady), it responds very well.
Is there any way I can improve it's responsiveness ?
I'm not a coder, so I know my options may be limited. I'd
love to find a way to keep this graphic. FP estimates the
download time of my homepage as 25 seconds on 28k, which
sounds pretty good to me. Any help is great. Many
Thanks,...Brightbelt