RTF rendering in Word 2003

[3SL - Developer]

In Word 2003 an RTF image is rendered at a different size to when a RTF image
is rendered in Word 2000.

i have been autmating a rtf to ppt procedure and would like to know if the
image size difference in the rtf for 2003 was a known bug that is being dealt
with ?

 

[Bob Buckland ?:-\)]

Hi 3SL,

Can you provide additional details on the image type and how you're determining how the image is rendered (i.e. are you talking
about a specific graphic type, are you referring to the size after reopening an RTF file in a specific copy of Word)?

If a graphic contains a pixel per inch (PPI) value in the graphic then Word generally honors it. If the graphic does not have a
value then Word will size a graphic using the setting in
Tools=>Options=>General=>Web Options
to determine the Pixels per inch calculation.

============
In Word 2003 an RTF image is rendered at a different size to when a RTF image
is rendered in Word 2000.

i have been autmating a rtf to ppt procedure and would like to know if the
image size difference in the rtf for 2003 was a known bug that is being dealt
with ? <<

 

[3SL - Developer]

Hi Bob,

i am re-opening a generated rtf in averiety of Word versions where the most
consistent is 2000 as XP and 2003 seem to render the images at a different
size i.e taking the original image size rather than the expected display
size. the images in question are displayed the fLayoutInCell rtf option.
where i have to break the image out of the cell to copy it to it's
destination.

{\pict{\*\picprop\shplid1026{\sp{\sn shapeType}{\sv 75}}{\sp{\sn fFlipH}{\sv
0}}{\sp{\sn fFlipV}{\sv 0}}{\sp{\sn pibFlags}{\sv 2}}{\sp{\sn fLine}{\sv
0}}{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 1}}{\sp{\sn fLayoutInCell}{\sv 1}}}
\picscalex39\picscaley39\piccropl0\piccropr0\piccropt0\piccropb0\picw4304\pich8184\picwgoal2440\pichgoal4640\jpegblip\bliptag-1529907418{\*\blipuid
a4cf77266c3bba1412125a68e428b6e2}

is the rtf picture declaration should the ppi be in here ?? or would it be
stored as part of the binary image ??

regards,

Stuart Dodd