B?UGhpbCBIb2Rnc29uIFVL?= said:
Sorry, Erik,
I think that you are on Microsoft's payroll...
You are missing the point ENTIRELY...
Give it up, Phil. You will never get through to them. I still have my
suspicions that some of the MVP's are on Microsoft's payroll but they
will never admit it. Some of the postings I have read even sound more
like a bot than a real person in their dogged repetition of the same old
MS BS. But whatever you do don't accuse them of it. Every MVP in the
country will come rallying to their defense. And no matter how polite you
are or how many names you DON'T call anyone they will seek every
opportunity to run you down and claim you are saying things you haven't.
They will insult your intelligence, and your character. They will claim
everyone you have ever met must have disliked you because of your
argumentative attitude. All because you dared to disagree with them or
ask them to stop insulting you. I have come to suspect it is a
subconscious desire to undermine the credibility of anyone who dares to
challenge an MVP.
As to the MVP status. Being designated an MVP does not confer any direct
obligations on a person, nor do MVP's get paid directly from Microsoft.
However, many MVP's do profit financially indirectly by being able to get
more clients, attract more web site visitors, or sell more books due to
their designation. Once they have the designation they dearly want to
keep it. And from the behaviour I have seen, the only way to keep it is
to repeat MS rhetoric as often as possible.
Interestingly, the people who do claim to be on the MS payroll, like
Chris Pratley, are usually much more honest about the failings of MS
products. Chris Pratley will tell you that he knows something doesn't
work as well as he would have liked but they weren't given enough time or
money to do it any differently. I appreciate that honesty. Perhaps the
actual MS employees don't have to worry about getting fired just for
telling the truth as long as they aren't revealing a trade secret. All MS
has to do to an MVP is not give them the designation next time around.