F
florent prunier
Hello,
Here is a little problem of mine that no one around me can answer (a
recurrent problem!). Imagine a very simple case study where I work on two
fields, let’s say: <Species> and <Locality>.
I want to report the results of a study (an inventory) so that I create a
straightforward report. With the sorting and grouping facilities this could
give easily this:
Species 1
Locality 1
Locality 2
Locality 3
Species 2
etc.
So far, so good: all my information is correctly sorted. Unfortunately this
solution combining just few hundreds <Species> and few dozens <Localities>
takes thousand of lines! It soon becomes rather tedious to read and not
synthetic at all. Presenting a cross table is not very effective either
because there are enough localities for the number of columns is unbearable.
What I need is the following:
Species 1
123
Species 2
1
Or even better:
Species 1 1,2,3
Species 2 1
Is there anyone who know how to separate grouped records by (let’s say) a
coma instead of a line.
Thank you very much indeed.
Here is a little problem of mine that no one around me can answer (a
recurrent problem!). Imagine a very simple case study where I work on two
fields, let’s say: <Species> and <Locality>.
I want to report the results of a study (an inventory) so that I create a
straightforward report. With the sorting and grouping facilities this could
give easily this:
Species 1
Locality 1
Locality 2
Locality 3
Species 2
etc.
So far, so good: all my information is correctly sorted. Unfortunately this
solution combining just few hundreds <Species> and few dozens <Localities>
takes thousand of lines! It soon becomes rather tedious to read and not
synthetic at all. Presenting a cross table is not very effective either
because there are enough localities for the number of columns is unbearable.
What I need is the following:
Species 1
123
Species 2
1
Or even better:
Species 1 1,2,3
Species 2 1
Is there anyone who know how to separate grouped records by (let’s say) a
coma instead of a line.
Thank you very much indeed.