Thank you for taking time to respond.
I used to use PM (and was a strong promoter of it) in the late 60s and 70s
in the heavy construction industry (in a different country, in a different
language), in a graphical mode with manual calculations, obviously......long
story.
Having moved "upstairs" I became quite rusty, except that whenever I could I
"forced" staff to employ some form of PM, with various degree of success,
mostly failures. Analyzing the activities and their interdependencies to
achieve an objective was too much a hassle and people preferred to fly by
the seat of their pants. Having been retired for a number of years now I
lost track of corporate governance methods and tools, but I doubt things
have changes much. Programs like Time-System, Day Timers, Outlook, other
PIMs, still probably prevail, or "nothing". It's "crisis management",
management of filling time of individuals or groups, with little attention
paid to results and what happens between the beginning and the end.
My initial question was about smaller undertakings, hardly "projects", but
more than tasks. The beauty of a smaller "project" handled by the use of
some form of project management software or an add-on to Microsoft Office
Family and/or OneNote (as existed in the initial version of Microsoft
Project (I think) in a form of a Wizard, was in leading (forcing) the user
to think about it in terms of tasks and milestones as well as constrains,
and few resources.
Re-reading my diatribe I recognize the shortcomings of my description.
Let me try with a more descriptive example. During the course of a day we
all experience a sudden flash of an idea, or a co-worker/supervisor makes a
request. So you jot it down. For that there are plenty of ways to do it
within Office. When you return to it you realize that it is not as simple as
it may have appeared initially. So what do you do now? You write out the
tasks as you think of them, as they pop up. While you are at the fourth one
you realize that it really should become the second one and so on. As you
continue you realize you will have to wait for an outcome of another task,
either done by you or by an external resource. So you reshuffle your list,
jot down couple of milestones, make a side note about a resource or two and
you a have a sceenful or a sheet of paper, which looks a bit confusing,
there is no graphical representation of it (Gantt), nor a time-line. You set
it aside, come back to it in couple of days and then it even makes less
sense because you have forgotten few things. You sure cannot show it to
others for it really does not portray any coherent picture. You work at it a
bit more, it becomes even more convoluted and you will most likely abandon
it as unusable. The only advantage gained was your partial analysis of what
is needed to accomplish the "project".
So what I have in mind is a wizard/template or several to choose from, which
would guide me in expanding the idea into a small "project". There could be
tie-in with Outlook Calendar and OneNote. The upcoming new version of Office
will have OnenNote included, which is actively marketed to students. They
sure would benefit by having this capability.
In a short synopsis: Microsoft Project has become a tool for specialized
professional management. I know of no similar tool for everyday computer
users who would like to be, or should be, better organized, or using the
term I just heard in a Microsoft TV commercial, empowered. Office is a
collection of very powerful, complex software programs. Instead of making
them even more powerful, they should keep and improve their complexity but
in the service to the user without having him/her have to learn all the
intricacies of the command structure.
I better stop right here, when I get going I get going. I wish I wasn't over
seventy so I could work with this and other ideas how computers can better
interact with users without having to learn complex programs.
I moved away from the original topic, a simple "project management"
template/wizard, sorry for that.
Pavel