W
woytek
We have a (broken) Project Server 2003 installation at the facility where I
work. I'm the sysadmin, and we're trying to transition control of this
system from the consultant who set it up to us. After that is done, we plan
on fixing it. In the meantime, here's a question that I couldn't seem to
answer (though I honestly haven't finished perusing all of the online
documentation yet):
We have Project Server and SharePoint Services running on one machine, and
SQL Server 2000 running on another machine. I would like to use a private
network for connectivity between these two machines for database data.
Changing the appropriate pointer in the ProjectServer/SharePoint Services
configurations seems to work, but then users connecting via MS Project
Professional 2003 are unable to connect to the database server.
Is there a way to tell ProjectServer/SharePoint Services to use one link for
the database, but have it respond to clients with a different address for the
same database server? It seems to me that this should be possible, but I
can't seem to find an "easy" place to configure that. Any hints, please toss
them my way. Thanks.
jonathan
work. I'm the sysadmin, and we're trying to transition control of this
system from the consultant who set it up to us. After that is done, we plan
on fixing it. In the meantime, here's a question that I couldn't seem to
answer (though I honestly haven't finished perusing all of the online
documentation yet):
We have Project Server and SharePoint Services running on one machine, and
SQL Server 2000 running on another machine. I would like to use a private
network for connectivity between these two machines for database data.
Changing the appropriate pointer in the ProjectServer/SharePoint Services
configurations seems to work, but then users connecting via MS Project
Professional 2003 are unable to connect to the database server.
Is there a way to tell ProjectServer/SharePoint Services to use one link for
the database, but have it respond to clients with a different address for the
same database server? It seems to me that this should be possible, but I
can't seem to find an "easy" place to configure that. Any hints, please toss
them my way. Thanks.
jonathan