J
john.e.palmer
Pardon me while I vent.
I’d call Excel 2008 a dog, except that I like dogs. IT’S
EXTRAORDINARILY SLOW.
For example, using the same Excel file at the same location on the
server, the time to open the file is 12 minutes 22 seconds in Excel
2008 and 1 minute 30 seconds in Excel 2004. I can restart Leopard,
open Boot Camp, boot Windows XP, start Excel 2003, go through the
directories to find the file and load the file in 2 minutes and 15
seconds. This is about 5 times faster than simply loading the file in
Excel 2008. (The file opens in about 10 seconds in Excel 2003.)
It takes 10 minutes 35 seconds to recalculate in Excel 2008 and about
the same in Excel 2004. WinExcel 2003 takes about 4 minutes.
And don't get me started on how long a simple chart takes to load.
If I click on a tab with a chart, it takes 35 seconds for the page to
load in Excel 2008 and 0.5 seconds in Excel 2004 and Excel 2003.
Since the file has to be shared with Windows users, it is in *.xls
format. Could this be part of the slowness?
As near as I can see, the only reason to use Excel 2008 is if you
exceed the number of rows or columns that WinExcel 2003 or MacExcel
2004 can handle. To paraphrase my father, Excel 2008 is as worthless
as “certain appendages” on a boar. MS should be ashamed of releasing
such a product.
And yes, I have posted my feelings on the feedback site.
I’d call Excel 2008 a dog, except that I like dogs. IT’S
EXTRAORDINARILY SLOW.
For example, using the same Excel file at the same location on the
server, the time to open the file is 12 minutes 22 seconds in Excel
2008 and 1 minute 30 seconds in Excel 2004. I can restart Leopard,
open Boot Camp, boot Windows XP, start Excel 2003, go through the
directories to find the file and load the file in 2 minutes and 15
seconds. This is about 5 times faster than simply loading the file in
Excel 2008. (The file opens in about 10 seconds in Excel 2003.)
It takes 10 minutes 35 seconds to recalculate in Excel 2008 and about
the same in Excel 2004. WinExcel 2003 takes about 4 minutes.
And don't get me started on how long a simple chart takes to load.
If I click on a tab with a chart, it takes 35 seconds for the page to
load in Excel 2008 and 0.5 seconds in Excel 2004 and Excel 2003.
Since the file has to be shared with Windows users, it is in *.xls
format. Could this be part of the slowness?
As near as I can see, the only reason to use Excel 2008 is if you
exceed the number of rows or columns that WinExcel 2003 or MacExcel
2004 can handle. To paraphrase my father, Excel 2008 is as worthless
as “certain appendages” on a boar. MS should be ashamed of releasing
such a product.
And yes, I have posted my feelings on the feedback site.