J
James
Hi,
We have come across a situation where tasks which have started early in
relation to their predecessors no longer split so that the remaining work
continues only after the predecessor task is planned to complete.
For example suppose we have two tasks A and B linked FS. Both tasks have 3
resouces assigned. But task B starts early relative to the finish of A. If
we reschedule the remaining work on task A, then normally we would expect
task B to split and for the remining work to be rescheduled in line with the
delay in remaining work on A.
BUT if one of the resources on Task B has finished and their assignment
shows as 100% complete, and we try the same thing then Task B des not split.
We can't figure out why - can anyone please explain this logic please?
Thanks
James
We have come across a situation where tasks which have started early in
relation to their predecessors no longer split so that the remaining work
continues only after the predecessor task is planned to complete.
For example suppose we have two tasks A and B linked FS. Both tasks have 3
resouces assigned. But task B starts early relative to the finish of A. If
we reschedule the remaining work on task A, then normally we would expect
task B to split and for the remining work to be rescheduled in line with the
delay in remaining work on A.
BUT if one of the resources on Task B has finished and their assignment
shows as 100% complete, and we try the same thing then Task B des not split.
We can't figure out why - can anyone please explain this logic please?
Thanks
James