S
Sean3DD
Am I the only one who has come across this problem.
It is obviously associated with both spelling and grammatical context and
occurs in both 2003 & 2007 versions of Word.
In a sentence such as ‘thank you for your much valued patronage', my
spelling/grammar checker insists that this spelling is wrong and should be
changed to ‘thank you for you're much valued patronage'. If contractions are
not used it would read as ‘thank you for you are much valued patronage'. For
those of us who have struggled for years to improve our use of the english
language, being told that this is a 'common mistake', is just irritating.
I wonder how many students have been 'down graded' because they had accepted
the Word version.
Not a question so much as a rant - and as I have seen on many a web site
gramma is an affectionate contraction of Grandma and not the method by which
most languages control the usage of words and sentences.
regards to all
Sean 3DD
It is obviously associated with both spelling and grammatical context and
occurs in both 2003 & 2007 versions of Word.
In a sentence such as ‘thank you for your much valued patronage', my
spelling/grammar checker insists that this spelling is wrong and should be
changed to ‘thank you for you're much valued patronage'. If contractions are
not used it would read as ‘thank you for you are much valued patronage'. For
those of us who have struggled for years to improve our use of the english
language, being told that this is a 'common mistake', is just irritating.
I wonder how many students have been 'down graded' because they had accepted
the Word version.
Not a question so much as a rant - and as I have seen on many a web site
gramma is an affectionate contraction of Grandma and not the method by which
most languages control the usage of words and sentences.
regards to all
Sean 3DD