B
bobc721
Jeff,
I was able to make the subform and this isn't exactly what I am needing.
While it does away with the duplication of fields, it doesn't fit the
exercise.
The employee timesheet is a separate record, we are not planning to
including it in the main database at the present time. What I am attempting
to do is get a table entry that will verify the job number, name, client, and
pm. (pull from the job_list and put it in timesheet), the employee can then
enter the date, hours, task code, and work description.
the main form (job_list) and have a subform linked would be a great idea if
it populated a table that would have the information completely filled out.
ie, job no, job name, client, pm, date, hours, task code, work description.
the way I did the subform it was not creating a new table or populating the
existing time table, but creating secondary records (don't have a clue where
they were being sent to) for each individual job... and that's not what I am
looking for.
this has been fun digging, but at the same time frustrating because I didn't
think that Access would be that difficult for a seemingly simple task.
I was able to make the subform and this isn't exactly what I am needing.
While it does away with the duplication of fields, it doesn't fit the
exercise.
The employee timesheet is a separate record, we are not planning to
including it in the main database at the present time. What I am attempting
to do is get a table entry that will verify the job number, name, client, and
pm. (pull from the job_list and put it in timesheet), the employee can then
enter the date, hours, task code, and work description.
the main form (job_list) and have a subform linked would be a great idea if
it populated a table that would have the information completely filled out.
ie, job no, job name, client, pm, date, hours, task code, work description.
the way I did the subform it was not creating a new table or populating the
existing time table, but creating secondary records (don't have a clue where
they were being sent to) for each individual job... and that's not what I am
looking for.
this has been fun digging, but at the same time frustrating because I didn't
think that Access would be that difficult for a seemingly simple task.