transactions and disconnected recordsets

8

85ascMcLaren

Since I am using disconnected recordsets in ADO, do you see any point for me
to also put a transacation around it? I am viewing my disconnected
recordsets as a sort of transaction where if there is an error on the update,
I just don't connect the local recordset back to the actual database
connection to write the actual changes..

Any thought on my opinion or logic behind my thinking ?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Use a persisted XML file as datasource 1
Cannot Use Disconnected Recordsets With Access 2003 Forms 1
DAO Transactions via ODBC 0
Recordsets via VBA vs. direct table access for multiple users 2
Binding forms to ADODB recordsets 2
Outlook remains disconnected..."magically" reconnects later 1
Disconnected Recordset 0
Difference between Offline and Disconnected 1

Top