B
BaBaBo
Thanks @ advance.
Got two comboboxes in series.
Firs combobox defines skill area e.g. Running.
Second combobx uses the value selected in the first combobox to narrow the
list of choices in the second combobox.
Question: What is the most economical way of setting up the tables?
I am currently repeating the primary key from the "Skill Area" table as a
Foreign Key in the "Specific Skill Area Ability" table. This repeat of the
info alows me to use a select query to fill the second combobox with only the
skills specific to the skill area. e.g.
100 Meter Hurdle is a specific skill under the "Skill Area" of Running.
Should I only have one table with the following rows.
PrimaryKey.
Skill
SkillAbility
But if I do this I will be repeating the Skill for each Skill Ability. This
is counter to the point of Relational Data Bases?
Got two comboboxes in series.
Firs combobox defines skill area e.g. Running.
Second combobx uses the value selected in the first combobox to narrow the
list of choices in the second combobox.
Question: What is the most economical way of setting up the tables?
I am currently repeating the primary key from the "Skill Area" table as a
Foreign Key in the "Specific Skill Area Ability" table. This repeat of the
info alows me to use a select query to fill the second combobox with only the
skills specific to the skill area. e.g.
100 Meter Hurdle is a specific skill under the "Skill Area" of Running.
Should I only have one table with the following rows.
PrimaryKey.
Skill
SkillAbility
But if I do this I will be repeating the Skill for each Skill Ability. This
is counter to the point of Relational Data Bases?