W
Will
I have 18 users using Access 97 application on their local
systems, and using a single database file on the server
that was created in 1997 with over 200,000 records in the
main table. The database file is only 70 MB's in size, and
I know the theorectic limit is 1 GB.
We are starting to have occasional strange errors which I
won't go into detail. I have to do a "Tools, Utilities,
Repair Database" about every two weeks.
My question is, if I purchase Access 2003 and convert the
data, is 2003 much more stable than 97? Or does it even
matter. Is A-2003 just more bells and whistles? Which I
don't need. It would be a costly upgrade.
The answer is probably obvious, but are there serious
arguments to upgrading, regarding stability.
One reason we have never upgraded is because 97 has been
surprisingly stable. Also we use pivot tables quite a bit,
and I saw in Access 2002, that pivot tables are very
different than in 97. Way less user friendly.
Thanks in advance.
systems, and using a single database file on the server
that was created in 1997 with over 200,000 records in the
main table. The database file is only 70 MB's in size, and
I know the theorectic limit is 1 GB.
We are starting to have occasional strange errors which I
won't go into detail. I have to do a "Tools, Utilities,
Repair Database" about every two weeks.
My question is, if I purchase Access 2003 and convert the
data, is 2003 much more stable than 97? Or does it even
matter. Is A-2003 just more bells and whistles? Which I
don't need. It would be a costly upgrade.
The answer is probably obvious, but are there serious
arguments to upgrading, regarding stability.
One reason we have never upgraded is because 97 has been
surprisingly stable. Also we use pivot tables quite a bit,
and I saw in Access 2002, that pivot tables are very
different than in 97. Way less user friendly.
Thanks in advance.