M
MattBell
We have an infopath solution which we are going to be deploying at a client
site in the not so distant future, and I'm starting to look into the trust
options of info path. Up until now we were using a self generated certificate
to trust our forms in development, but now that we need to deploy off site
this obviously won't cut it.
In reading through the documentation it seems that the two options are:
1. Sign your form with a fully trusted cert.
2. Create a fully trusted URN based form with the RegForm tool.
Is there an advantage of using one over another? Also for the security
impaired, what sort of cert would you recommend for option 1? Something like
a Verisign Code signing cert?
site in the not so distant future, and I'm starting to look into the trust
options of info path. Up until now we were using a self generated certificate
to trust our forms in development, but now that we need to deploy off site
this obviously won't cut it.
In reading through the documentation it seems that the two options are:
1. Sign your form with a fully trusted cert.
2. Create a fully trusted URN based form with the RegForm tool.
Is there an advantage of using one over another? Also for the security
impaired, what sort of cert would you recommend for option 1? Something like
a Verisign Code signing cert?