R
Rich K
I am examining the design of a small access database. There is 5 tables,
with one main table and 4 tables for lookup values. Fairly simple design.
Most of the data entry is done on one form. This form has several fields
that are combo box with limit to list set to no. This is where it gets
interesting. Most of these combo boxes have a row source that uses a
distinct query against the field that it populates. So, in theory they can
grow with the database. I don't like this design at all. My thinking is
that as the "main" table grows, the populating of all of these combo boxes
will take more and more resources, causing the form loading to become slower
and slower. The designer claims to have plenty of forms in use that
implement this strategy without complaints.
Am I being overly sensitive, or will this become a problem? Anybody with
experience in this type of form design?
Thanks in advance.
with one main table and 4 tables for lookup values. Fairly simple design.
Most of the data entry is done on one form. This form has several fields
that are combo box with limit to list set to no. This is where it gets
interesting. Most of these combo boxes have a row source that uses a
distinct query against the field that it populates. So, in theory they can
grow with the database. I don't like this design at all. My thinking is
that as the "main" table grows, the populating of all of these combo boxes
will take more and more resources, causing the form loading to become slower
and slower. The designer claims to have plenty of forms in use that
implement this strategy without complaints.
Am I being overly sensitive, or will this become a problem? Anybody with
experience in this type of form design?
Thanks in advance.